Group-SAE: Efficient Training of Sparse Autoencoders for Large Language Models via Layer Groups
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
SAEs have recently been employed as a promising unsupervised approach for understanding the representations of layers of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, with the growth in model size and complexity, training SAEs is computationally intensive, as typically one SAE is trained for each model layer. To address such limitation, we propose textitGroup-SAE, a novel strategy to train SAEs. Our method considers the similarity of the residual stream representations between contiguous layers to group similar layers and train a single SAE per group. To balance the trade-off between efficiency and performance, we further introduce textitAMAD (Average Maximum Angular Distance), an empirical metric that guides the selection of an optimal number of groups based on representational similarity across layers. Experiments on models from the Pythia family show that our approach significantly accelerates training with minimal impact on reconstruction quality and comparable downstream task performance and interpretability over baseline SAEs trained layer by layer. This method provides an efficient and scalable strategy for training SAEs in modern LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 14 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2024.
Builds on
14 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Residual Stream Analysis with Multi-Layer SAEs6 Sep
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep
Other references · 11
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
- 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 319
- 2017Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithmscited by 60
- 2021Fine-Tuned Transformers Show Clusters of Similar Representations Across Layerscited by 30
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Modelscited by 76
- 2025Evaluate Bias without Manual Test Sets: A Concept Representation Perspective for LLMscited by 6
- 2025LLM Interpretability with Identifiable Temporal-Instantaneous Representationcited by 6
- 2025Beyond Input Activations: Identifying Influential Latents by Gradient Sparse Autoencoderscited by 4
- 2025A Comparative Analysis of Sparse Autoencoder and Activation Difference in Language Model Steeringcited by 4
- 2025Time-Aware Feature Selection: Adaptive Temporal Masking for Stable Sparse Autoencoder Trainingcited by 1
- 2025LouvreSAE: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable and Controllable Style Transfercited by 1
- 2025Sparsification and Reconstruction from the Perspective of Representation Geometrycited by 0
- 2026Identifying Temporal Features within Transcoders for Time Sensitive Factual Recallcited by 0
- 2026The System Prompt Illusion: How Instruction Preambles Modify Computation in Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utilitycited by 0
- 2026Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility14 Oct 2026
- 2026Identifying Temporal Features within Transcoders for Time Sensitive Factual Recall27 Sep 2026
- 2026The System Prompt Illusion: How Instruction Preambles Modify Computation in Language Models23 Sep 2026
- 2025LouvreSAE: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable and Controllable Style Transfer22 Dec 2025
- 2025Time-Aware Feature Selection: Adaptive Temporal Masking for Stable Sparse Autoencoder Training9 Oct 2025
- 2025LLM Interpretability with Identifiable Temporal-Instantaneous Representation27 Sep 2025
- 2025A Comparative Analysis of Sparse Autoencoder and Activation Difference in Language Model Steering24 Sep 2025
- 2025Sparsification and Reconstruction from the Perspective of Representation Geometry28 May 2025
- 2025Evaluate Bias without Manual Test Sets: A Concept Representation Perspective for LLMs21 May 2025
- 2025Beyond Input Activations: Identifying Influential Latents by Gradient Sparse Autoencoders12 May 2025
- 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models7 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Discovering Millions of Interpretable Features with Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability
- 2025Revisiting End-To-End Sparse Autoencoder Training: A Short Finetune Is All You Need
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features
- 2025Beyond Redundancy: Diverse and Specialized Multi-Expert Sparse Autoencoder
- 2025AdaptiveK: Complexity-Driven Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Language Model Representations
- 2026GroupMask: Layer-Adaptive Group-wise Sparsity for Semi-Structured LLM Pruning
- 2025Low-Rank Adapting Models for Sparse Autoencoders