mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ambiguity is the last thing you need

arXiv 2410.20222 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clear legal language forms the backbone of a contract for numerous reasons. Disputes often arise between contract parties where ambiguous language has been used and parties often disagree on the meaning or effect of the words. Unambiguous language can also be important where there is an imbalance of bargaining strength between the parties, for instance where a business is contracting with a consumer, where the law actually requires plain language to be used. Thus, plain language minimises misinterpretation and prevents future litigation. Contracts become ambiguous when the language used is vague, imprecise, or open to multiple interpretations and this is due to the vast number of synonyms in the English Language which creates differences in interpretation between the meaning of the language. Ambiguity has always formed a prevalent issue in case-law, with a large percentage of cases based on ambiguous language. Thus, from an outside perspective the legal sector should look forward to ways of reducing this.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 3 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2024.

Builds on

0 of 3 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.