mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Using Parametric PINNs for Predicting Internal and External Turbulent Flows

arXiv 2410.18917 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solvers employing two-equation eddy viscosity models are the industry standard for simulating turbulent flows using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) formulation. While these methods are computationally less expensive than direct numerical simulations, they can still incur significant computational costs to achieve the desired accuracy. In this context, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) offer a promising approach for developing parametric surrogate models that leverage both existing, but limited CFD solutions and the governing differential equations to predict simulation outcomes in a computationally efficient, differentiable, and near real-time manner. In this work, we build upon the previously proposed RANS-PINN framework, which only focused on predicting flow over a cylinder. To investigate the efficacy of RANS-PINN as a viable approach to building parametric surrogate models, we investigate its accuracy in predicting relevant turbulent flow variables for both internal and external flows. To ensure training convergence with a more complex loss function, we adopt a novel sampling approach that exploits the domain geometry to ensure a proper balance among the contributions from various regions within the solution domain. The effectiveness of this framework is then demonstrated for two scenarios that represent a broad class of internal and external flow problems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2024.

Builds on

13 of 21 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  2. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
  3. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
  4. 2019Towards Physics-informed Deep Learning for Turbulent Flow Predictioncited by 204
  5. 2021Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learningcited by 138
  6. 2024A comprehensive and FAIR comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networkscited by 104
  7. 2020MeshfreeFlowNet: A Physics-Constrained Deep Continuous Space-Time Super-Resolution Frameworkcited by 78
  8. 2019Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Convergence Guaranteescited by 77
  9. 2021Physics-informed neural networks for solving Reynolds-averaged Navierunicodex2013Stokes equationscited by 68
  10. 2017Lat-Net: Compressing Lattice Boltzmann Flow Simulations using Deep Neural Networkscited by 11
  11. 2020Frequency-compensated PINNs for Fluid-dynamic Design Problemscited by 8
  12. 2023RANS-PINN based Simulation Surrogates for Predicting Turbulent Flowscited by 5
1 more
  1. 2022Demystifying the Data Need of ML-surrogates for CFD Simulationscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.