mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Screw Geometry Meets Bandits: Incremental Acquisition of Demonstrations to Generate Manipulation Plans

arXiv 2410.18275 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2024cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we study the problem of methodically obtaining a sufficient set of kinesthetic demonstrations, one at a time, such that a robot can be confident of its ability to perform a complex manipulation task in a given region of its workspace. Although programming by demonstration has been an active area of research, the problems of checking whether a set of demonstrations is sufficient and systematically seeking additional demonstrations have remained open. We present an approach for the robot to incrementally and actively ask for new demonstration examples, one at a time, until the robot can assess with high confidence that it can perform the task successfully. Our approach uses: (i) a screw geometric representation of motion to generate manipulation plans from demonstrations, which makes the sufficiency of a set of demonstrations measurable; (ii) a sampling strategy based on PAC-learning from multi-armed bandit optimization to evaluate the robot's ability to generate manipulation plans in a subregion of its task space; and (iii) a heuristic to seek additional demonstration from areas of weakness. We present results of a user study conducted with 22 participants (without any background in robotics) on two example manipulation tasks, namely pouring and scooping, to assess the utility and usability of our approach. The results show that a handful of examples (fewer than 10) were needed to successfully teach the robot to plan tasks. A short video supplement is available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/KbAPgIouIvo

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2024.

Builds on

10 of 48 references.

References · 10

  1. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
  2. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,838
  3. 2024Mobile ALOHA: Learning Bimanual Mobile Manipulation with Low-Cost Whole-Body Teleoperationcited by 391
  4. 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 239
  5. 2022SE(3)-DiffusionFields: Learning smooth cost functions for joint grasp and motion optimization through diffusioncited by 127
  6. 2021Hierarchical Neural Dynamic Policiescited by 17
  7. 2020Merging Position and Orientation Motion Primitivescited by 12
  8. 2024EVE: Enabling Anyone to Train Robots using Augmented Realitycited by 4
  9. 2022Human-Guided Planning for Complex Manipulation Tasks Using the Screw Geometry of Motioncited by 1
  10. 2022Autonomous Assessment of Demonstration Sufficiency via Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning Forward & Reverse Skills from a Single Unfinished Demonstration for Constrained Manipulation Tasks
  2. 2022Evaluating the Effectiveness of Corrective Demonstrations and a Low-Cost Sensor for Dexterous Manipulation
  3. 2025When a Robot is More Capable than a Human: Learning from Constrained Demonstrators
  4. 2018Constraint Estimation and Derivative-Free Recovery for Robot Learning from Demonstrations
  5. 2021Learning from Successful and Failed Demonstrations via Optimization
  6. 2022Robot Learning from Demonstration Using Elastic Maps
  7. 2024Reward Learning from Suboptimal Demonstrations with Applications in Surgical Electrocautery
  8. 2021Learning Forceful Manipulation Skills from Multi-modal Human Demonstrations