mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Rethinking Positive Pairs in Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2410.18200 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The training methods in AI do involve semantically distinct pairs of samples. However, their role typically is to enhance the between class separability. The actual notion of similarity is normally learned from semantically identical pairs. This paper presents SimLAP: a simple framework for learning visual representation from arbitrary pairs. SimLAP explores the possibility of learning similarity from semantically distinct sample pairs. The approach is motivated by the observation that for any pair of classes there exists a subspace in which semantically distinct samples exhibit similarity. This phenomenon can be exploited for a novel method of learning, which optimises the similarity of an arbitrary pair of samples, while simultaneously learning the enabling subspace. The feasibility of the approach will be demonstrated experimentally and its merits discussed.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2024.

Builds on

29 of 37 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,043
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,009
  4. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,712
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,492
  6. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,991
  7. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,713
  8. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,624
  9. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,730
  10. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,850
  11. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,838
  12. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,811
17 more
  1. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,434
  2. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,841
  3. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,826
  4. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 735
  5. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 693
  6. 2017Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networkscited by 529
  7. 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 417
  8. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 375
  9. 2021Parametric Contrastive Learningcited by 217
  10. 2021On Feature Decorrelation in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 160
  11. 2022Generalized Parametric Contrastive Learningcited by 45
  12. 2021Conditional Contrastive Learning for Improving Fairness in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 25
  13. 2023Active Self-Supervised Learning: A Few Low-Cost Relationships Are All You Needcited by 9
  14. 2024mathbbX-Sample Contrastive Loss: Improving Contrastive Learning with Sample Similarity Graphscited by 9
  15. 2022Visualizing and Understanding Contrastive Learningcited by 7
  16. 2021Integrating Auxiliary Information in Self-supervised Learningcited by 6
  17. 2024DailyMAE: Towards Pretraining Masked Autoencoders in One Daycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4.

5 papers.