mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploiting Text-Image Latent Spaces for the Description of Visual Concepts

arXiv 2410.17832 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) offer insights into neural network decision-making by linking human friendly concepts to the model's internal feature extraction process. However, when a new set of CAVs is discovered, they must still be translated into a human understandable description. For image-based neural networks, this is typically done by visualizing the most relevant images of a CAV, while the determination of the concept is left to humans. In this work, we introduce an approach to aid the interpretation of newly discovered concept sets by suggesting textual descriptions for each CAV. This is done by mapping the most relevant images representing a CAV into a text-image embedding where a joint description of these relevant images can be computed. We propose utilizing the most relevant receptive fields instead of full images encoded. We demonstrate the capabilities of this approach in multiple experiments with and without given CAV labels, showing that the proposed approach provides accurate descriptions for the CAVs and reduces the challenge of concept interpretation.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2024.

Builds on

25 of 37 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  6. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  7. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  8. 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,291
  9. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  10. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
  11. 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
  12. 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
13 more
  1. 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 282
  2. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  3. 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 254
  4. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  5. 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
  6. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 225
  7. 2022Patches Are All You Need?cited by 201
  8. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
  9. 2016Grad-CAM: Why did you say that?cited by 159
  10. 2022CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision Networkscited by 144
  11. 2022Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Featurescited by 136
  12. 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
  13. 2023Text-To-Concept (and Back) via Cross-Model Alignmentcited by 63

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.