An Effective Theory of Bias Amplification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models can capture and amplify biases present in data, leading to disparate test performance across social groups. To better understand, evaluate, and mitigate these biases, a deeper theoretical understanding of how model design choices and data distribution properties contribute to bias is needed. In this work, we contribute a precise analytical theory in the context of ridge regression, both with and without random projections, where the former models feedforward neural networks in a simplified regime. Our theory offers a unified and rigorous explanation of machine learning bias, providing insights into phenomena such as bias amplification and minority-group bias in various feature and parameter regimes. For example, we observe that there may be an optimal regularization penalty or training time to avoid bias amplification, and there can be differences in test error between groups that are not alleviated with increased parameterization. Importantly, our theoretical predictions align with empirical observations reported in the literature on machine learning bias. We extensively empirically validate our theory on synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024DPA: A one-stop metric to measure bias amplification in classification datasetscited by 1
- 2025When majority rules, minority loses: bias amplification of gradient descentcited by 1
- 2025auto-fpt: Automating Free Probability Theory Calculations for Machine Learning Theorycited by 0
- 2026Rater State Bias in RLHF Preference Data: An Audit Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026To do(x) or not to do(x): Medical Image Counterfactuals for Dataset Augmentationcited by 0
- 2026To do(x) or not to do(x): Medical Image Counterfactuals for Dataset Augmentation12 Sep 2026
- 2026Rater State Bias in RLHF Preference Data: An Audit Framework14 Apr 2026
- 2025When majority rules, minority loses: bias amplification of gradient descent19 May 2025
- 2025auto-fpt: Automating Free Probability Theory Calculations for Machine Learning Theory14 Apr 2025
- 2024DPA: A one-stop metric to measure bias amplification in classification datasets15 Dec 2024