mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Code-Driven Law NO, Normware SI!

arXiv 2410.17257 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.SEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the digitalization of society, the interest, the debates and the research efforts concerning "code", "law", "artificial intelligence", and their various relationships, have been widely increasing. Yet, most arguments primarily focus on contemporary computational methods and artifacts (inferential models constructed via machine-learning methods, rule-based systems, smart contracts), rather than attempting to identify more fundamental mechanisms. Aiming to go beyond this conceptual limitation, this paper introduces and elaborates on "normware" as an explicit additional stance -- complementary to software and hardware -- for the interpretation and the design of artificial devices. By means of a few examples, I will argue that a normware-centred perspective provides a more adequate abstraction to study and design interactions between computational systems and human institutions, and may help with the design and development of technical interventions within wider socio-technical views.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2024.

Builds on

5 of 67 references.

References · 5

  1. 2021Catala: A Programming Language for the Lawcited by 20
  2. 2017Enabling Reasoning with LegalRuleMLcited by 8
  3. 2021To Trust or Not to Trust a Regressor: Estimating and Explaining Trustworthiness of Regression Predictionscited by 5
  4. 2018The Role of Normware in Trustworthy and Explainable AIcited by 3
  5. 2022DPCL: a Language Template for Normative Specificationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.