mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Tug of War Within: Mitigating the Fairness-Privacy Conflicts in Large Language Models

arXiv 2410.16672 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2024cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring awareness of fairness and privacy in Large Language Models (LLMs) is critical. Interestingly, we discover a counter-intuitive trade-off phenomenon that enhancing an LLM's privacy awareness through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) methods significantly decreases its fairness awareness with thousands of samples. To address this issue, inspired by the information theory, we introduce a training-free method to Suppress the Privacy and faIrness coupled Neurons (SPIN), which theoretically and empirically decrease the mutual information between fairness and privacy awareness. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that SPIN eliminates the trade-off phenomenon and significantly improves LLMs' fairness and privacy awareness simultaneously without compromising general capabilities, eg improving Qwen-2-7B-Instruct's fairness awareness by 12.2% and privacy awareness by 14.0%. More crucially, SPIN remains robust and effective with limited annotated data or even when only malicious fine-tuning data is available, whereas SFT methods may fail to perform properly in such scenarios. Furthermore, we show that SPIN could generalize to other potential trade-off dimensions. We hope this study provides valuable insights into concurrently addressing fairness and privacy concerns in LLMs and can be integrated into comprehensive frameworks to develop more ethical and responsible AI systems. Our code is available at https://github.com/ChnQ/SPIN.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 71 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2024.

Builds on

71 of 111 references.

References · 71

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  8. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  9. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  10. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  11. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  12. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
38 more
  1. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  4. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  6. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  7. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
  8. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
  9. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  10. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
  11. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  12. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
  13. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  14. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
  15. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
  16. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
  17. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  18. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  19. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  20. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 803
  21. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  22. 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 740
  23. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
  24. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
  25. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
  26. 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 550
  27. 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 458
  28. 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 419
  29. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
  30. 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
  31. 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 392
  32. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
  33. 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
  34. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  35. 2023Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Modelscited by 284
  36. 2021Parameter-efficient Multi-task Fine-tuning for Transformers via Shared Hypernetworkscited by 278
  37. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  38. 2023Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context Learningcited by 235

50 most cited of 71 All 71 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

5 papers.