Reflection-Bench: Evaluating Epistemic Agency in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With large language models (LLMs) increasingly deployed as cognitive engines for AI agents, the reliability and effectiveness critically hinge on their intrinsic epistemic agency, which remains understudied. Epistemic agency, the ability to flexibly construct, adapt, and monitor beliefs about dynamic environments, represents a base-model-level capacity independent of specific tools, modules, or applications. We characterize the holistic process underlying epistemic agency, which unfolds in seven interrelated dimensions: prediction, decision-making, perception, memory, counterfactual thinking, belief updating, and meta-reflection. Correspondingly, we propose Reflection-Bench, a cognitive-psychology-inspired benchmark consisting of seven tasks with long-term relevance and minimization of data leakage. Through a comprehensive evaluation of 16 models using three prompting strategies, we identify a clear three-tier performance hierarchy and significant limitations of current LLMs, particularly in meta-reflection capabilities. While state-of-the-art LLMs demonstrate rudimentary signs of epistemic agency, our findings suggest several promising research directions, including enhancing core cognitive functions, improving cross-functional coordination, and developing adaptive processing mechanisms. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/AI45Lab/ReflectionBench.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2024.
Builds on
28 of 72 references.
References · 28
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
- 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agentscited by 437
- 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 398
16 more
- 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 382
- 2024To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoningcited by 263
- 2022On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot Reasoningcited by 194
- 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
- 2024Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Makingcited by 144
- 2022Thinking Fast and Slow in Large Language Modelscited by 137
- 2024Benchmarking Benchmark Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 106
- 2024Can large language models explore in-context?cited by 76
- 2024Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agentscited by 56
- 2023From task structures to world models: What do LLMs know?cited by 46
- 2024FlowBench: Revisiting and Benchmarking Workflow-Guided Planning for LLM-based Agentscited by 40
- 2020Understanding Human Intelligence through Human Limitationscited by 33
- 2024Belief Revision: The Adaptability of Large Language Models Reasoningcited by 30
- 2024Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometricscited by 22
- 2024Eliciting the Priors of Large Language Models using Iterated In-Context Learningcited by 19
- 2024A LLM Benchmark based on the Minecraft Builder Dialog Agent Taskcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2025Designing Domain-Specific Agents via Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanismcited by 16
- 2025LR^2Bench: Evaluating Long-chain Reflective Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models via Constraint Satisfaction Problemscited by 4
- 2025Empowering Real-World: A Survey on the Technology, Practice, and Evaluation of LLM-driven Industry Agentscited by 2
- 2025Diagnostics of cognitive failures in multi-agent expert systems using dynamic evaluation protocols and subsequent mutation of the processing contextcited by 0
- 2026Mechanistic Origin of Moral Indifference in Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Separable Pathways for Causal Reasoning: How Architectural Scaffolding Enables Hypothesis-Space Restructuring in LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026Set-shifting Behavioral Test for Harnessed Agentscited by 0
- 2026Set-shifting Behavioral Test for Harnessed Agents15 Jul 2026
- 2026Separable Pathways for Causal Reasoning: How Architectural Scaffolding Enables Hypothesis-Space Restructuring in LLM Agents21 Apr 2026
- 2026Mechanistic Origin of Moral Indifference in Language Models16 Mar 2026
- 2025Designing Domain-Specific Agents via Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism21 Nov 2025
- 2025Empowering Real-World: A Survey on the Technology, Practice, and Evaluation of LLM-driven Industry Agents20 Oct 2025
- 2025Diagnostics of cognitive failures in multi-agent expert systems using dynamic evaluation protocols and subsequent mutation of the processing context18 Sep 2025
- 2025LR^2Bench: Evaluating Long-chain Reflective Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models via Constraint Satisfaction Problems25 Feb 2025