mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Security of Language Models for Code: A Systematic Literature Review

arXiv 2410.15631 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2024cs.SE cs.CRcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models for code (CodeLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for code-related tasks, outperforming traditional methods and standard machine learning approaches. However, these models are susceptible to security vulnerabilities, drawing increasing research attention from domains such as software engineering, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity. Despite the growing body of research focused on the security of CodeLMs, a comprehensive survey in this area remains absent. To address this gap, we systematically review 67 relevant papers, organizing them based on attack and defense strategies. Furthermore, we provide an overview of commonly used language models, datasets, and evaluation metrics, and highlight open-source tools and promising directions for future research in securing CodeLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

7 papers.