mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Predicting adaptively chosen observables in quantum systems

arXiv 2410.15501 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2024quant-ph cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances have demonstrated that O(log M) measurements suffice to predict M properties of arbitrarily large quantum many-body systems. However, these remarkable findings assume that the properties to be predicted are chosen independently of the data. This assumption can be violated in practice, where scientists adaptively select properties after looking at previous predictions. This work investigates the adaptive setting for three classes of observables: local, Pauli, and bounded-Frobenius-norm observables. We prove that Omega(√M) samples of an arbitrarily large unknown quantum state are necessary to predict expectation values of M adaptively chosen local and Pauli observables. We also present computationally-efficient algorithms that achieve this information-theoretic lower bound. In contrast, for bounded-Frobenius-norm observables, we devise an algorithm requiring only O(log M) samples, independent of system size. Our results highlight the potential pitfalls of adaptivity in analyzing data from quantum experiments and provide new algorithmic tools to safeguard against erroneous predictions in quantum experiments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2024.

Builds on

17 of 82 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 233
  2. 2021Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learningcited by 96
  3. 2015Algorithmic Stability for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 88
  4. 2015Generalization in Adaptive Data Analysis and Holdout Reusecited by 83
  5. 2018Online Learning of Quantum Statescited by 37
  6. 2019A New Analysis of Differential Privacy's Generalization Guaranteescited by 36
  7. 2014Interactive Fingerprinting Codes and the Hardness of Preventing False Discoverycited by 35
  8. 2017Calibrating Noise to Variance in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 29
  9. 2017Quantum SDP-Solvers: Better upper and lower boundscited by 27
  10. 2017Generalization for Adaptively-chosen Estimators via Stable Mediancited by 26
  11. 2021Efficient estimation of Pauli observables by derandomizationcited by 20
  12. 2020A bounded-noise mechanism for differential privacycited by 15
5 more
  1. 2020Classical Shadows With Noisecited by 14
  2. 2023Subsampling Suffices for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 9
  3. 2020On Avoiding the Union Bound When Answering Multiple Differentially Private Queriescited by 5
  4. 2020Privately Answering Counting Queries with Generalized Gaussian Mechanismscited by 4
  5. 2016Dealing with Range Anxiety in Mean Estimation via Statistical Queriescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.