mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic identification of diagnosis from hospital discharge letters via weakly supervised Natural Language Processing

arXiv 2410.15051 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying patient diagnoses from hospital discharge letters is essential for large-scale cohort selection and epidemiological research, but traditional supervised approaches require extensive manual annotation, which is often impractical for large textual datasets. We present a weakly supervised Natural Language Processing (NLP) pipeline for classifying Italian discharge letters without document-level manual annotation. The method extracts diagnosis-related sentences, generates semantic embeddings using a transformer model further pre-trained on Italian medical documents, and applies a two-level clustering procedure to derive weak labels that are then used to train a document-level classifier. The approach was evaluated in a case study on bronchiolitis using 33,176 discharge letters of children admitted to 44 emergency rooms or hospitals in the Veneto Region, Italy, between 2017 and 2020. The best weakly supervised model achieved an AUROC of 77.68% (±4.30%), an AUPRC of 73.13% (±4.93%), and an F1-score of 78.14% (±4.89%) against manually annotated data. Performance surpassed unsupervised baselines and approached fully supervised models, while reducing the need for manual annotation by more than 1,500 hours for a dataset of this size. Similar model rankings were observed in a secondary validation on a smaller bronchitis dataset (3,188 discharge letters, 2020-2025), where the best weakly supervised model achieved an AUPRC of 76.72% (± 5.02%). These results suggest the potential of weakly supervised NLP methods for scalable disease identification from clinical discharge letters.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2024.

Builds on

16 of 74 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  5. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  6. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
  7. 2019Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddingscited by 1,002
  8. 2017Natural Language Processing: State of The Art, Current Trends and Challengescited by 114
  9. 2020Rethinking embedding coupling in pre-trained language modelscited by 103
  10. 2019ICD Coding from Clinical Text Using Multi-Filter Residual Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 73
  11. 2022Language Models in the Loop: Incorporating Prompting into Weak Supervisioncited by 52
  12. 2023Automated Medical Coding on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV: A Critical Review and Replicability Studycited by 49
4 more
  1. 2022Automated Clinical Coding: What, Why, and Where We Are?cited by 33
  2. 2023Natural Language Processing in Electronic Health Records in Relation to Healthcare Decision-making: A Systematic Reviewcited by 25
  3. 2024Advanced Natural-based interaction for the ITAlian language: LLaMAntino-3-ANITAcited by 17
  4. 2022On the Importance of Data Size in Probing Fine-tuned Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.