CAP: Data Contamination Detection via Consistency Amplification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used, but concerns about data contamination challenge the reliability of LLM evaluations. Existing contamination detection methods are often task-specific or require extra prerequisites, limiting practicality. We propose a novel framework, Consistency Amplification-based Data Contamination Detection (CAP), which introduces the Performance Consistency Ratio (PCR) to measure dataset leakage by leveraging LM consistency. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first method to explicitly differentiate between fine-tuning and contamination, which is crucial for detecting contamination in domain-specific models. Additionally, CAP is applicable to various benchmarks and works for both white-box and black-box models. We validate CAP's effectiveness through experiments on seven LLMs and four domain-specific benchmarks. Our findings also show that composite benchmarks from various dataset sources are particularly prone to unintentional contamination. Codes will be publicly available soon.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2024.
Builds on
23 of 35 references.
References · 23
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
- 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 562
- 2020CLUE: A Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 278
- 2023Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samplescited by 195
- 2024Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 147
- 2023Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Modelscited by 138
- 2023BooookScore: A systematic exploration of book-length summarization in the era of LLMscited by 137
- 2023Chatlaw: A Multi-Agent Legal Assistant based on a Role-Aligned Mixture-of-Experts Architecturecited by 122
11 more
- 2023Task Contamination: Language Models May Not Be Few-Shot Anymorecited by 99
- 2024ChatQA: Surpassing GPT-4 on Conversational QA and RAGcited by 90
- 2024BioMedLM: A 2.7B Parameter Language Model Trained On Biomedical Textcited by 86
- 2023DISC-FinLLM: A Chinese Financial Large Language Model based on Multiple Experts Fine-tuningcited by 64
- 2022ECTSum: A New Benchmark Dataset For Bullet Point Summarization of Long Earnings Call Transcriptscited by 59
- 2023FinEval: A Chinese Financial Domain Knowledge Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 52
- 2024AlphaFin: Benchmarking Financial Analysis with Retrieval-Augmented Stock-Chain Frameworkcited by 47
- 2023Data Contamination Through the Lens of Timecited by 40
- 2024Evading Data Contamination Detection for Language Models is (too) Easycited by 30
- 2024Revisiting Code Similarity Evaluation with Abstract Syntax Tree Edit Distancecited by 26
- 2023Competition-Level Problems are Effective LLM Evaluatorscited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.