mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MiCEval: Unveiling Multimodal Chain of Thought's Quality via Image Description and Reasoning Steps

arXiv 2410.14668 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 8

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Chain of Thought (MCoT) is a popular prompting strategy for improving the performance of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) across a range of complex reasoning tasks. Despite its popularity, there is a notable absence of automated methods for evaluating the quality of reasoning steps in MCoT. To address this gap, we propose Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Evaluation (MiCEval), a framework designed to assess the correctness of reasoning chains by evaluating the quality of both the description and each reasoning step. The evaluation of the description component focuses on the accuracy of the image descriptions, while the reasoning step evaluates the quality of each step as it is conditionally generated based on the preceding steps. MiCEval is built upon a fine-grained dataset with annotations that rate each step according to correctness, relevance, and informativeness. Extensive experiments on four state-of-the-art MLLMs show that step-wise evaluations using MiCEval align more closely with human judgments compared to existing methods based on cosine similarity or fine-tuning approaches. MiCEval datasets and code can be found in https://github.com/alenai97/MiCEval.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2024.

Builds on

12 of 63 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Visual CoT: Advancing Multi-Modal Language Models with a Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning25 Mar
  2. 2023Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models2 Feb

Other references · 10

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  5. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
  6. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
  7. 2024MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phonecited by 1,079
  8. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
  9. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 735
  10. 2024Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Beyond Accuracycited by 69

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Visual Thoughts: A Unified Perspective of Understanding Multimodal Chain-of-Thought
  2. 2025Multimodal Chain of Continuous Thought for Latent-Space Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025MDK12-Bench: A Multi-Discipline Benchmark for Evaluating Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models
  4. 2025LENS: Multi-level Evaluation of Multimodal Reasoning with Large Language Models
  5. 2026Look Light, Think Heavy: What Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Can and Cannot Do
  6. 2024MM-InstructEval: Zero-Shot Evaluation of (Multimodal) Large Language Models on Multimodal Reasoning Tasks
  7. 2025MME-CoT: Benchmarking Chain-of-Thought in Large Multimodal Models for Reasoning Quality, Robustness, and Efficiency
  8. 2026CoVA-SFT: A Large-Scale Dataset for Chain of Visual Abstractions