Leveraging generative models to characterize the failure conditions of image classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We address in this work the question of identifying the failure conditions of a given image classifier. To do so, we exploit the capacity of producing controllable distributions of high quality image data made available by recent Generative Adversarial Networks (StyleGAN2): the failure conditions are expressed as directions of strong performance degradation in the generative model latent space. This strategy of analysis is used to discover corner cases that combine multiple sources of corruption, and to compare in more details the behavior of different classifiers. The directions of degradation can also be rendered visually by generating data for better interpretability. Some degradations such as image quality can affect all classes, whereas other ones such as shape are more class-specific. The approach is demonstrated on the MNIST dataset that has been completed by two sources of corruption: noise and blur, and shows a promising way to better understand and control the risks of exploiting Artificial Intelligence components for safety-critical applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2024.
Builds on
19 of 25 references.
References · 19
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Datacited by 1,186
- 2021StyleCLIP: Text-Driven Manipulation of StyleGAN Imagerycited by 991
- 2020GANSpace: Discovering Interpretable GAN Controlscited by 614
- 2022StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse Datasetscited by 492
- 2020StyleSpace Analysis: Disentangled Controls for StyleGAN Image Generationcited by 332
7 more
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
- 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 218
- 2021EditGAN: High-Precision Semantic Image Editingcited by 156
- 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
- 2021Explaining in Style: Training a GAN to explain a classifier in StyleSpacecited by 122
- 2020A Survey on Generative Adversarial Networks: Variants, Applications, and Trainingcited by 97
- 2020Identifying Statistical Bias in Dataset Replicationcited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.