mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Non-Local Model Merging Problem: Permutation Symmetries and Variance Collapse

arXiv 2410.12766 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model merging aims to efficiently combine the weights of multiple expert models, each trained on a specific task, into a single multi-task model, with strong performance across all tasks. When applied to all but the last layer of weights, existing methods -- such as Task Arithmetic, TIES-merging, and TALL mask merging -- work well to combine expert models obtained by fine-tuning a common foundation model, operating within a "local" neighborhood of the foundation model. This work explores the more challenging scenario of "non-local" merging, which we find arises when an expert model changes significantly during pretraining or where the expert models do not even share a common foundation model. We observe that standard merging techniques often fail to generalize effectively in this non-local setting, even when accounting for permutation symmetries using standard techniques. We identify that this failure is, in part, due to "variance collapse", a phenomenon identified also in the setting of linear mode connectivity by Jordan et al. (2023). To address this, we propose a multi-task technique to re-scale and shift the output activations of the merged model for each task, aligning its output statistics with those of the corresponding task-specific expert models. Our experiments demonstrate that this correction significantly improves the performance of various model merging approaches in non-local settings, providing a strong baseline for future research on this problem.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.

Builds on

20 of 34 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  5. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  6. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  7. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
  8. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
  9. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
  10. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 637
  11. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 613
  12. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
8 more
  1. 2020Federated Learning with Matched Averagingcited by 564
  2. 2022Git Re-Basin: Merging Models modulo Permutation Symmetriescited by 471
  3. 2021The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networkscited by 291
  4. 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 224
  5. 2019Model Fusion via Optimal Transportcited by 219
  6. 2024Localizing Task Information for Improved Model Merging and Compressioncited by 131
  7. 2022REPAIR: REnormalizing Permuted Activations for Interpolation Repaircited by 120
  8. 2024Simultaneous linear connectivity of neural networks modulo permutationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

8 papers.