Local transfer learning Gaussian process modeling, with applications to surrogate modeling of expensive computer simulators
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A critical bottleneck for scientific progress is the costly nature of computer simulations for complex systems. Surrogate models provide an appealing solution: such models are trained on simulator evaluations, then used to emulate and quantify uncertainty on the expensive simulator at unexplored inputs. In many applications, one often has available data on related systems. For example, in designing a new jet turbine, there may be existing studies on turbines with similar configurations. A key question is how information from such ``source'' systems can be transferred for effective surrogate training on the ``target'' system of interest. We thus propose a new LOcal transfer Learning Gaussian Process (LOL-GP) model, which leverages a carefully-designed Gaussian process to transfer such information for surrogate modeling. The key novelty of the LOL-GP is a latent regularization model, which identifies regions where transfer should be performed and regions where it should be avoided. Such a ``local transfer'' property is present in many scientific systems: at certain parameters, systems may behave similarly and thus transfer is beneficial; at other parameters, they may behave differently and thus transfer is detrimental. By accounting for local transfer, the LOL-GP can temper the risk of ``negative transfer'', i.e., the risk of worsening predictive performance from information transfer. We derive a Gibbs sampling algorithm for efficient posterior predictive sampling on the LOL-GP, for both the multi-source and multi-fidelity transfer settings. We then show, via a suite of numerical experiments and an application for jet turbine design, the improved surrogate performance of the LOL-GP over existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.
Builds on
17 of 67 references.
References · 17
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
- 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
- 2021AFEC: Active Forgetting of Negative Transfer in Continual Learningcited by 73
- 2020Multi-fidelity Bayesian Neural Networks: Algorithms and Applicationscited by 59
- 2020Active Learning for Deep Gaussian Process Surrogatescited by 38
- 2019A hierarchical expected improvement method for Bayesian optimizationcited by 13
- 2020On Negative Transfer and Structure of Latent Functions in Multi-output Gaussian Processescited by 6
- 2021A graphical multi-fidelity Gaussian process model, with application to emulation of heavy-ion collisionscited by 6
- 2023Additive Multi-Index Gaussian process modeling, with application to multi-physics surrogate modeling of the quark-gluon plasmacited by 6
- 2022Transfer learning driven design optimization for inertial confinement fusioncited by 5
- 2019Adaptive design for Gaussian process regression under censoringcited by 3
5 more
- 2022Conglomerate Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Process Modeling, with Application to Heavy-Ion Collisionscited by 3
- 2023Hierarchical shrinkage Gaussian processes: applications to computer code emulation and dynamical system recoverycited by 3
- 2024Regularized Multi-output Gaussian Convolution Process with Domain Adaptationcited by 3
- 2024Targeted Variance Reduction: Robust Bayesian Optimization of Black-Box Simulators with Noise Parameterscited by 2
- 2019Bayesian analysis of multifidelity computer models with local features and non-nested experimental designs: Application to the WRF modelcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.