mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Predict Usage Options of Product Reviews with LLM-Generated Labels

arXiv 2410.12470 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Annotating large datasets can be challenging. However, crowd-sourcing is often expensive and can lack quality, especially for non-trivial tasks. We propose a method of using LLMs as few-shot learners for annotating data in a complex natural language task where we learn a standalone model to predict usage options for products from customer reviews. We also propose a new evaluation metric for this scenario, HAMS4, that can be used to compare a set of strings with multiple reference sets. Learning a custom model offers individual control over energy efficiency and privacy measures compared to using the LLM directly for the sequence-to-sequence task. We compare this data annotation approach with other traditional methods and demonstrate how LLMs can enable considerable cost savings. We find that the quality of the resulting data exceeds the level attained by third-party vendor services and that GPT-4-generated labels even reach the level of domain experts. We make the code and generated labels publicly available.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.

Builds on

18 of 37 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  7. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  8. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
  9. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 896
  10. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  11. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  12. 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 397
6 more
  1. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  2. 2022CodeRL: Mastering Code Generation through Pretrained Models and Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 342
  3. 2021Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Helpcited by 196
  4. 2023AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentationcited by 128
  5. 2023ChatGPT: Beginning of an End of Manual Linguistic Data Annotation? Use Case of Automatic Genre Identificationcited by 45
  6. 2024Knowledge Distillation in Automated Annotation: Supervised Text Classification with LLM-Generated Training Labelscited by 25

Built on by

Not cited yet.