mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation Evaluation

arXiv 2410.12265 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has highlighted the need for efficient and reliable methods to evaluate their performance. Traditional evaluation methods often face challenges like high costs, limited task formats, dependence on human references, and systematic biases. To address these limitations, we propose Auto-PRE, an automatic LLM evaluation framework inspired by the peer review process. Unlike previous approaches that rely on human annotations, Auto-PRE automatically selects evaluator LLMs based on three core traits: consistency, pertinence, and self-confidence, which correspond to the instruction, content, and response stages, respectively, and collectively cover the entire evaluation process. Experiments on three representative tasks, including summarization, non-factoid QA, and dialogue generation, demonstrate that Auto-PRE achieves state-of-the-art performance while significantly reducing evaluation costs. Furthermore, the structured and scalable design of our automatic qualification exam framework provides valuable insights into automating the evaluation of LLMs-as-judges, paving the way for more advanced LLM-based evaluation frameworks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.

Builds on

12 of 26 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  4. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  5. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  6. 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 742
  7. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 652
  8. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
  9. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 316
  10. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 302
  11. 2023Wider and Deeper LLM Networks are Fairer LLM Evaluatorscited by 94
  12. 2024PRE: A Peer Review Based Large Language Model Evaluatorcited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.