Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has highlighted the need for efficient and reliable methods to evaluate their performance. Traditional evaluation methods often face challenges like high costs, limited task formats, dependence on human references, and systematic biases. To address these limitations, we propose Auto-PRE, an automatic LLM evaluation framework inspired by the peer review process. Unlike previous approaches that rely on human annotations, Auto-PRE automatically selects evaluator LLMs based on three core traits: consistency, pertinence, and self-confidence, which correspond to the instruction, content, and response stages, respectively, and collectively cover the entire evaluation process. Experiments on three representative tasks, including summarization, non-factoid QA, and dialogue generation, demonstrate that Auto-PRE achieves state-of-the-art performance while significantly reducing evaluation costs. Furthermore, the structured and scalable design of our automatic qualification exam framework provides valuable insights into automating the evaluation of LLMs-as-judges, paving the way for more advanced LLM-based evaluation frameworks.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.
Builds on
12 of 26 references.
References · 12
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 742
- 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 652
- 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
- 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 316
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 302
- 2023Wider and Deeper LLM Networks are Fairer LLM Evaluatorscited by 94
- 2024PRE: A Peer Review Based Large Language Model Evaluatorcited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
- 2024Knowledge Editing through Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 26
- 2026Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Long-Form Output Evaluationcited by 5
- 2026Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Long-Form Output Evaluation1 Jun 2026
- 2024Knowledge Editing through Chain-of-Thought23 Dec 2024
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods7 Dec 2024