mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generative AI's aggregated knowledge versus web-based curated knowledge

arXiv 2410.12091 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2024cs.HC cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

his paper explores what kinds of questions are best served by the way generative AI (GenAI) using Large Language Models(LLMs) that aggregate and package knowledge, and when traditional curated web-sourced search results serve users better. An experiment compared product searches using ChatGPT, Google search engine, or both helped us understand more about the compelling nature of generated responses. The experiment showed GenAI can speed up some explorations and decisions. We describe how search can deepen the testing of facts, logic, and context. We show where existing and emerging knowledge paradigms can help knowledge exploration in different ways. Experimenting with searches, our probes showed the value for curated web search provides for very specific, less popularly-known knowledge. GenAI excelled at bringing together knowledge for broad, relatively well-known topics. The value of curated and aggregated knowledge for different kinds of knowledge reflected in different user goals. We developed a taxonomy to distinguishing when users are best served by these two approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2024.

Builds on

3 of 28 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019Analyzing the Structure of Attention in a Transformer Language Modelcited by 243
  2. 2023Comparing Traditional and LLM-based Search for Consumer Choice: A Randomized Experimentcited by 36
  3. 2023AI for the Generation and Testing of Ideas Towards an AI Supported Knowledge Development Environmentcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.