Enhancing AI Assisted Writing with One-Shot Implicit Negative Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI-mediated communication enables users to communicate more quickly and efficiently. Various systems have been proposed such as smart reply and AI-assisted writing. Yet, the heterogeneity of the forms of inputs and architectures often renders it challenging to combine insights from user behaviour in one system to improve performance in another. In this work, we consider the case where the user does not select any of the suggested replies from a smart reply system, and how this can be used as one-shot implicit negative feedback to enhance the accuracy of an AI writing model. We introduce Nifty, an approach that uses classifier guidance to controllably integrate implicit user feedback into the text generation process. Empirically, we find up to 34% improvement in Rouge-L, 89% improvement in generating the correct intent, and an 86% win-rate according to human evaluators compared to a vanilla AI writing system on the MultiWOZ and Schema-Guided Dialog datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2024.
Builds on
25 of 35 references.
References · 25
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2018MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modellingcited by 766
- 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 762
- 2020Recipes for building an open-domain chatbotcited by 593
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 503
- 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 378
- 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
- 2017Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Replycited by 229
- 2019Gmail Smart Compose: Real-Time Assisted Writingcited by 98
- 2023Rewarding Chatbots for Real-World Engagement with Millions of Userscited by 59
13 more
- 2016Smart Reply: Automated Response Suggestion for Emailcited by 54
- 2022DIRECTOR: Generator-Classifiers For Supervised Language Modelingcited by 38
- 2021Am I Me or You? State-of-the-Art Dialogue Models Cannot Maintain an Identitycited by 22
- 2019Diamonds in the Rough: Generating Fluent Sentences from Early-Stage Drafts for Academic Writing Assistancecited by 16
- 2019Diversifying Reply Suggestions using a Matching-Conditional Variational Autoencodercited by 14
- 2021IGA : An Intent-Guided Authoring Assistantcited by 12
- 2021A Dataset and Baselines for Multilingual Reply Suggestioncited by 9
- 2022Positive, Negative and Neutral: Modeling Implicit Feedback in Session-based News Recommendationcited by 9
- 2019OCC: A Smart Reply System for Efficient In-App Communicationscited by 7
- 2022Who Wrote this? How Smart Replies Impact Language and Agency in the Workplacecited by 5
- 2023Smart Word Suggestions for Writing Assistancecited by 4
- 2023Learning and Optimization of Implicit Negative Feedback for Industrial Short-video Recommender Systemcited by 1
- 2023End-to-End Autoregressive Retrieval via Bootstrapping for Smart Reply Systemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.