Non-convergence to global minimizers in data driven supervised deep learning: Adam and stochastic gradient descent optimization provably fail to converge to global minimizers in the training of deep neural networks with ReLU activation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning methods - consisting of a class of deep neural networks (DNNs) trained by a stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization method - are nowadays key tools to solve data driven supervised learning problems. Despite the great success of SGD methods in the training of DNNs, it remains a fundamental open problem of research to explain the success and the limitations of such methods in rigorous theoretical terms. In particular, even in the standard setup of data driven supervised learning problems, it remained an open research problem to prove (or disprove) that SGD methods converge in the training of DNNs with the popular rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation function with high probability to global minimizers in the optimization landscape. In this work we answer this question negatively. Specifically, in this work we prove for a large class of SGD methods that the considered optimizer does with high probability not converge to global minimizers of the optimization problem. It turns out that the probability to not converge to a global minimizer converges at least exponentially quickly to one as the width of the first hidden layer of the ANN and the depth of the ANN, respectively, increase. The general non-convergence results of this work do not only apply to the plain vanilla standard SGD method but also to a large class of accelerated and adaptive SGD methods such as the momentum SGD, the Nesterov accelerated SGD, the Adagrad, the RMSProp, the Adam, the Adamax, the AMSGrad, and the Nadam optimizers.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2025Sharp higher order convergence rates for the Adam optimizercited by 8
- 2025Non-convergence to the optimal risk for Adam and stochastic gradient descent optimization in the training of deep neural networkscited by 6
- 2025SAD Neural Networks: Divergent Gradient Flows and Asymptotic Optimality via o-minimal Structurescited by 5
- 2026Uniform a priori bounds and error analysis for the Adam stochastic gradient descent optimization methodcited by 3
- 2025Effective continuous equations for adaptive SGD: a stochastic analysis viewcited by 1
- 2026On the Convergence of Adam, Revisitedcited by 1
- 2025Error analysis for the deep Kolmogorov methodcited by 0
- 2026Convergence rates for the RMSprop optimizer with full control of the hyperparameterscited by 0
- 2026Convergence rates for the RMSprop optimizer with full control of the hyperparameters31 Aug 2026
- 2026On the Convergence of Adam, Revisited3 Jul 2026
- 2026Uniform a priori bounds and error analysis for the Adam stochastic gradient descent optimization method19 Mar 2026
- 2025Effective continuous equations for adaptive SGD: a stochastic analysis view25 Sep 2025
- 2025Error analysis for the deep Kolmogorov method23 Aug 2025
- 2025SAD Neural Networks: Divergent Gradient Flows and Asymptotic Optimality via o-minimal Structures14 May 2025
- 2025Sharp higher order convergence rates for the Adam optimizer28 Apr 2025
- 2025Non-convergence to the optimal risk for Adam and stochastic gradient descent optimization in the training of deep neural networks3 Mar 2025