Do we need more complex representations for structure? A comparison of note duration representation for Music Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, deep learning has achieved formidable results in creative computing. When it comes to music, one viable model for music generation are Transformer based models. However, while transformers models are popular for music generation, they often rely on annotated structural information. In this work, we inquire if the off-the-shelf Music Transformer models perform just as well on structural similarity metrics using only unannotated MIDI information. We show that a slight tweak to the most common representation yields small but significant improvements. We also advocate that searching for better unannotated musical representations is more cost-effective than producing large amounts of curated and annotated data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2024.
Builds on
8 of 18 references.
References · 8
- 2018Music Transformercited by 211
- 2017MuseGAN: Multi-track Sequential Generative Adversarial Networks for Symbolic Music Generation and Accompanimentcited by 151
- 2018This Time with Feeling: Learning Expressive Musical Performancecited by 68
- 2020The Jazz Transformer on the Front Line: Exploring the Shortcomings of AI-composed Music through Quantitative Measurescited by 53
- 2021Theme Transformer: Symbolic Music Generation with Theme-Conditioned Transformercited by 40
- 2022Multitrack Music Transformercited by 28
- 2020Quantifying Musical Style: Ranking Symbolic Music based on Similarity to a Stylecited by 6
- 2023Impact of time and note duration tokenizations on deep learning symbolic music modelingcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.