mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Edge Unlearning is Not "on Edge"! An Adaptive Exact Unlearning System on Resource-Constrained Devices

arXiv 2410.10128 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.CRcited by 9

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

The right to be forgotten mandates that machine learning models enable the erasure of a data owner's data and information from a trained model. Removing data from the dataset alone is inadequate, as machine learning models can memorize information from the training data, increasing the potential privacy risk to users. To address this, multiple machine unlearning techniques have been developed and deployed. Among them, approximate unlearning is a popular solution, but recent studies report that its unlearning effectiveness is not fully guaranteed. Another approach, exact unlearning, tackles this issue by discarding the data and retraining the model from scratch, but at the cost of considerable computational and memory resources. However, not all devices have the capability to perform such retraining. In numerous machine learning applications, such as edge devices, Internet-of-Things (IoT), mobile devices, and satellites, resources are constrained, posing challenges for deploying existing exact unlearning methods. In this study, we propose a Constraint-aware Adaptive Exact Unlearning System at the network Edge (CAUSE), an approach to enabling exact unlearning on resource-constrained devices. Aiming to minimize the retrain overhead by storing sub-models on the resource-constrained device, CAUSE innovatively applies a Fibonacci-based replacement strategy and updates the number of shards adaptively in the user-based data partition process. To further improve the effectiveness of memory usage, CAUSE leverages the advantage of model pruning to save memory via compression with minimal accuracy sacrifice. The experimental results demonstrate that CAUSE significantly outperforms other representative systems in realizing exact unlearning on the resource-constrained device by 9.23%-80.86%, 66.21%-83.46%, and 5.26%-194.13% in terms of unlearning speed, energy consumption, and accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 27 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2024.

Builds on

27 of 61 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine Unlearning4 Apr
  2. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  3. 2023A Duty to Forget, a Right to be Assured? Exposing Vulnerabilities in Machine Unlearning Services15 Sep
  4. 2023Machine Unlearning: A Survey6 Jun
  5. 2023Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearning11 Apr
  6. 2021On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearning22 Oct
  7. 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearning27 Sep
  8. 2021Adaptive Machine Unlearning8 Jun

Other references · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  4. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
  5. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
  6. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
  7. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 535
  8. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 465
  9. 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 311
  10. 2020Approximate Data Deletion from Machine Learning Modelscited by 255
  11. 2019MetaPruning: Meta Learning for Automatic Neural Network Channel Pruningcited by 227
  12. 2019Model Pruning Enables Efficient Federated Learning on Edge Devicescited by 222
7 more
  1. 2021Chasing Sparsity in Vision Transformers: An End-to-End Explorationcited by 183
  2. 2020DeltaGrad: Rapid retraining of machine learning modelscited by 149
  3. 2020Machine Unlearning for Random Forestscited by 131
  4. 2022Recommendation Unlearningcited by 80
  5. 2021Vision Transformer Pruningcited by 79
  6. 2021Manipulating SGD with Data Ordering Attackscited by 74
  7. 2022Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Neural Network Pruningcited by 45

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey
  2. 2025Verifiable Unlearning on Edge
  3. 2023Machine Unlearning: Solutions and Challenges
  4. 2023Learn to Unlearn: A Survey on Machine Unlearning
  5. 2024AdaProb: Efficient Machine Unlearning via Adaptive Probability
  6. 2024Towards Scalable Exact Machine Unlearning Using Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
  7. 2024A hybrid framework for effective and efficient machine unlearning
  8. 2025Efficient Machine Unlearning by Model Splitting and Core Sample Selection