mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uncovering, Explaining, and Mitigating the Superficial Safety of Backdoor Defense

arXiv 2410.09838 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Backdoor attacks pose a significant threat to Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) as they allow attackers to manipulate model predictions with backdoor triggers. To address these security vulnerabilities, various backdoor purification methods have been proposed to purify compromised models. Typically, these purified models exhibit low Attack Success Rates (ASR), rendering them resistant to backdoored inputs. However, Does achieving a low ASR through current safety purification methods truly eliminate learned backdoor features from the pretraining phase? In this paper, we provide an affirmative answer to this question by thoroughly investigating the Post-Purification Robustness of current backdoor purification methods. We find that current safety purification methods are vulnerable to the rapid re-learning of backdoor behavior, even when further fine-tuning of purified models is performed using a very small number of poisoned samples. Based on this, we further propose the practical Query-based Reactivation Attack (QRA) which could effectively reactivate the backdoor by merely querying purified models. We find the failure to achieve satisfactory post-purification robustness stems from the insufficient deviation of purified models from the backdoored model along the backdoor-connected path. To improve the post-purification robustness, we propose a straightforward tuning defense, Path-Aware Minimization (PAM), which promotes deviation along backdoor-connected paths with extra model updates. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PAM significantly improves post-purification robustness while maintaining a good clean accuracy and low ASR. Our work provides a new perspective on understanding the effectiveness of backdoor safety tuning and highlights the importance of faithfully assessing the model's safety.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2024.

Builds on

44 of 56 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  7. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  8. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  9. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  10. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  11. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
  12. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
32 more
  1. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
  2. 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 550
  3. 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 530
  4. 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 478
  5. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Ciphercited by 401
  6. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
  7. 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
  8. 2020Invisible Backdoor Attack with Sample-Specific Triggerscited by 338
  9. 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 328
  10. 2019Label-Consistent Backdoor Attackscited by 285
  11. 2023Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Modelscited by 284
  12. 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 276
  13. 2021Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned Datacited by 258
  14. 2021Adversarial Neuron Pruning Purifies Backdoored Deep Modelscited by 230
  15. 2021Fast Yet Effective Machine Unlearningcited by 209
  16. 2024Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 193
  17. 2020Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defensescited by 171
  18. 2021Adversarial Unlearning of Backdoors via Implicit Hypergradientcited by 160
  19. 2021Poisoning and Backdooring Contrastive Learningcited by 149
  20. 2022Backdoor Defense via Decoupling the Training Processcited by 149
  21. 2022BackdoorBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Backdoor Learningcited by 124
  22. 2020Adversarial Machine Learning -- Industry Perspectivescited by 121
  23. 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 116
  24. 2022Boosting the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks with Reverse Adversarial Perturbationcited by 67
  25. 2023Enhancing Fine-Tuning Based Backdoor Defense with Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 60
  26. 2023Reconstructive Neuron Pruning for Backdoor Defensecited by 56
  27. 2022Mechanistic Mode Connectivitycited by 50
  28. 2023UNICORN: A Unified Backdoor Trigger Inversion Frameworkcited by 44
  29. 2023Towards Stable Backdoor Purification through Feature Shift Tuningcited by 30
  30. 2024Competition Report: Finding Universal Jailbreak Backdoors in Aligned LLMscited by 27
  31. 2022Universal Backdoor Attacks Detection via Adaptive Adversarial Probecited by 16
  32. 2023Revisiting Personalized Federated Learning: Robustness Against Backdoor Attackscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

6 papers.