mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches for Classifying Spinodal Events

arXiv 2410.09756 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2024cs.LG hep-ex physics.data-ancited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we compare the performance of deep learning models for classifying the spinodal dataset. We evaluate state-of-the-art models (MobileViT, NAT, EfficientNet, CNN), alongside several ensemble models (majority voting, AdaBoost). Additionally, we explore the dataset in a transformed color space. Our findings show that NAT and MobileViT outperform other models, achieving the highest metrics-accuracy, AUC, and F1 score on both training and testing data (NAT: 94.65, 0.98, 0.94; MobileViT: 94.20, 0.98, 0.94), surpassing the earlier CNN model (88.44, 0.95, 0.88). We also discuss failure cases for the top performing models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2024.

Builds on

7 of 20 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  3. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  4. 2021MobileViT: Light-weight, General-purpose, and Mobile-friendly Vision Transformercited by 642
  5. 2022Neighborhood Attention Transformercited by 239
  6. 2018The History Began from AlexNet: A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Learning Approachescited by 75
  7. 2021Shared Data and Algorithms for Deep Learning in Fundamental Physicscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.