Universal scaling laws in quantum-probabilistic machine learning by tensor network towards interpreting representation and generalization powers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Interpreting the representation and generalization powers has been a long-standing issue in the field of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence. This work contributes to uncovering the emergence of universal scaling laws in quantum-probabilistic ML. We take the generative tensor network (GTN) in the form of a matrix product state as an example and show that with an untrained GTN (such as a random TN state), the negative logarithmic likelihood (NLL) L generally increases linearly with the number of features M, i.e., L simeq k M + const. This is a consequence of the so-called ``catastrophe of orthogonality,'' which states that quantum many-body states tend to become exponentially orthogonal to each other as M increases. We reveal that while gaining information through training, the linear scaling law is suppressed by a negative quadratic correction, leading to L simeq β M - α M2 + const. The scaling coefficients exhibit logarithmic relationships with the number of training samples and the number of quantum channels chi. The emergence of the quadratic correction term in NLL for the testing (training) set can be regarded as evidence of the generalization (representation) power of GTN. Over-parameterization can be identified by the deviation in the values of α between training and testing sets while increasing chi. We further investigate how orthogonality in the quantum feature map relates to the satisfaction of quantum probabilistic interpretation, as well as to the representation and generalization powers of GTN. The unveiling of universal scaling laws in quantum-probabilistic ML would be a valuable step toward establishing a white-box ML scheme interpreted within the quantum probabilistic framework.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2024.
Builds on
20 of 41 references.
References · 20
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 999
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 403
- 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
- 2019Tree Tensor Networks for Generative Modelingcited by 64
8 more
- 2017Machine Learning by Unitary Tensor Network of Hierarchical Tree Structurecited by 40
- 2019Generative Tensor Network Classification Model for Supervised Machine Learningcited by 22
- 2021Tensor networks for unsupervised machine learningcited by 21
- 2023Tensor networks for interpretable and efficient quantum-inspired machine learningcited by 17
- 2023Machine learning with tree tensor networks, CP rank constraints, and tensor dropoutcited by 15
- 2020Residual Matrix Product State for Machine Learningcited by 10
- 2022Privacy-preserving machine learning with tensor networkscited by 9
- 2022Unsupervised Recognition of Informative Features via Tensor Network Machine Learning and Quantum Entanglement Variationscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Interpretable Machine Learning in Physics: A Reviewcited by 14
- 2025Interpretable Machine Learning in Physics: A Review30 Mar 2025