mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Semantic Cues from Foundation Vision Models for Enhanced Local Feature Correspondence

arXiv 2410.09533 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2024cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual correspondence is a crucial step in key computer vision tasks, including camera localization, image registration, and structure from motion. The most effective techniques for matching keypoints currently involve using learned sparse or dense matchers, which need pairs of images. These neural networks have a good general understanding of features from both images, but they often struggle to match points from different semantic areas. This paper presents a new method that uses semantic cues from foundation vision model features (like DINOv2) to enhance local feature matching by incorporating semantic reasoning into existing descriptors. Therefore, the learned descriptors do not require image pairs at inference time, allowing feature caching and fast matching using similarity search, unlike learned matchers. We present adapted versions of six existing descriptors, with an average increase in performance of 29% in camera localization, with comparable accuracy to existing matchers as LightGlue and LoFTR in two existing benchmarks. Both code and trained models are available at https://www.verlab.dcc.ufmg.br/descriptors/reasoning_accv24

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2024.

Builds on

22 of 25 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  3. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
  4. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
  5. 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,313
  6. 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 974
  7. 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 731
  8. 2023LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speedcited by 583
  9. 2018From Coarse to Fine: Robust Hierarchical Localization at Large Scalecited by 556
  10. 2023ALIKED: A Lighter Keypoint and Descriptor Extraction Network via Deformable Transformationcited by 120
  11. 2024Efficient LoFTR: Semi-Dense Local Feature Matching with Sparse-Like Speedcited by 119
  12. 2024XFeat: Accelerated Features for Lightweight Image Matchingcited by 113
10 more
  1. 2021ALIKE: Accurate and Lightweight Keypoint Detection and Descriptor Extractioncited by 77
  2. 2023DeDoDe: Detect, Don't Describe -- Describe, Don't Detect for Local Feature Matchingcited by 62
  3. 2024OmniGlue: Generalizable Feature Matching with Foundation Model Guidancecited by 55
  4. 2023SFD2: Semantic-guided Feature Detection and Descriptioncited by 28
  5. 2023Learning Rotation-Equivariant Features for Visual Correspondencecited by 23
  6. 2024MESA: Matching Everything by Segmenting Anythingcited by 16
  7. 2023Enhancing Deformable Local Features by Jointly Learning to Detect and Describe Keypointscited by 11
  8. 2022Sim2Real Object-Centric Keypoint Detection and Descriptioncited by 8
  9. 2021Extracting Deformation-Aware Local Features by Learning to Deformcited by 7
  10. 2022Learning Geodesic-Aware Local Features from RGB-D Imagescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.