mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AI versus AI in Financial Crimes and Detection: GenAI Crime Waves to Co-Evolutionary AI

arXiv 2410.09066 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adoption of AI by criminal entities across traditional and emerging financial crime paradigms has been a disturbing recent trend. Particularly concerning is the proliferation of generative AI, which has empowered criminal activities ranging from sophisticated phishing schemes to the creation of hard-to-detect deep fakes, and to advanced spoofing attacks to biometric authentication systems. The exploitation of AI by criminal purposes continues to escalate, presenting an unprecedented challenge. AI adoption causes an increasingly complex landscape of fraud typologies intertwined with cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Overall, GenAI has a transformative effect on financial crimes and fraud. According to some estimates, GenAI will quadruple the fraud losses by 2027 with a staggering annual growth rate of over 30% [27]. As crime patterns become more intricate, personalized, and elusive, deploying effective defensive AI strategies becomes indispensable. However, several challenges hinder the necessary progress of AI-based fincrime detection systems. This paper examines the latest trends in AI/ML-driven financial crimes and detection systems. It underscores the urgent need for developing agile AI defenses that can effectively counteract the rapidly emerging threats. It also aims to highlight the need for cooperation across the financial services industry to tackle the GenAI induced crime waves.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2024.

Builds on

2 of 35 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  2. 2019Towards Federated Graph Learning for Collaborative Financial Crimes Detectioncited by 33

Built on by

Not cited yet.