mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vision Backbone Efficient Selection for Image Classification in Low-Data Regimes

arXiv 2410.08592 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transfer learning has become an essential tool in modern computer vision, allowing practitioners to leverage backbones, pretrained on large datasets, to train successful models from limited annotated data. Choosing the right backbone is crucial, especially for small datasets, since final performance depends heavily on the quality of the initial feature representations. While prior work has conducted benchmarks across various datasets to identify universal top-performing backbones, we demonstrate that backbone effectiveness is highly dataset-dependent, especially in low-data scenarios where no single backbone consistently excels. To overcome this limitation, we introduce dataset-specific backbone selection as a new research direction and investigate its practical viability in low-data regimes. Since exhaustive evaluation is computationally impractical for large backbone pools, we formalize Vision Backbone Efficient Selection (VIBES) as the problem of searching for high-performing backbones under computational constraints. We define the solution space, propose several heuristics, and demonstrate VIBES feasibility for low-data image classification by performing experiments on four diverse datasets. Our results show that even simple search strategies can find well-suited backbones within a pool of over 1300 pretrained models, outperforming generic benchmark recommendations within just ten minutes of search time on a single GPU (NVIDIA RTX A5000).

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2024.

Builds on

16 of 28 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  5. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  6. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
  7. 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
  8. 2019Revisiting Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 250
  9. 2020How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?cited by 213
  10. 2019Scaling and Benchmarking Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 201
  11. 2023Battle of the Backbones: A Large-Scale Comparison of Pretrained Models across Computer Vision Taskscited by 72
  12. 2021No One Representation to Rule Them All: Overlapping Features of Training Methodscited by 57
4 more
  1. 2023Does progress on ImageNet transfer to real-world datasets?cited by 35
  2. 2023ConvNet vs Transformer, Supervised vs CLIP: Beyond ImageNet Accuracycited by 19
  3. 2021Combining pretrained CNN feature extractors to enhance clustering of complex natural imagescited by 7
  4. 2024Which Backbone to Use: A Resource-efficient Domain Specific Comparison for Computer Visioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.