mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Integrating AI for Enhanced Feedback in Translation Revision- A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Student Engagement

arXiv 2410.08581 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2024cs.HC cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the well-established importance of feedback in education, the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated feedback, particularly from language models like ChatGPT, remains understudied in translation education. This study investigates the engagement of master's students in translation with ChatGPT-generated feedback during their revision process. A mixed-methods approach, combining a translation-and-revision experiment with quantitative and qualitative analyses, was employed to examine the feedback, translations pre-and post-revision, the revision process, and student reflections. The results reveal complex interrelations among cognitive, affective, and behavioural dimensions influencing students' engagement with AI feedback and their subsequent revisions. Specifically, the findings indicate that students invested considerable cognitive effort in the revision process, despite finding the feedback comprehensible. Additionally, they exhibited moderate affective satisfaction with the feedback model. Behaviourally, their actions were largely influenced by cognitive and affective factors, although some inconsistencies were observed. This research provides novel insights into the potential applications of AI-generated feedback in translation teachingand opens avenues for further investigation into the integration of AI tools in language teaching settings.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2024.

Builds on

1 of 62 references.

References · 1

  1. 2023Exploring the effectiveness of ChatGPT-based feedback compared with teacher feedback and self-feedback: Evidence from Chinese to English translationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Understanding Teacher Revisions of Large Language Model-Generated Feedback
  2. 2026Student Evaluation of Repeated AI Feedback Across a Semester of Writing ↗
  3. 2025Evaluating Trust in AI, Human, and Co-produced Feedback Among Undergraduate Students
  4. 2025ChatGPT produces more "lazy" thinkers: Evidence of cognitive engagement decline
  5. 2025Exploring LLM-Generated Feedback for Economics Essays: How Teaching Assistants Evaluate and Envision Its Use
  6. 2026A Classroom Study of LLM-Generated Feedback Intervention in Introductory Programming
  7. 2026Micro-level AI Feedback Features and Student Responses in Consecutive LLM Tutoring Interactions ↗
  8. 2023Students' Perceptions and Preferences of Generative Artificial Intelligence Feedback for Programming