Humanity in AI: Detecting the Personality of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Questionnaires are a common method for detecting the personality of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, their reliability is often compromised by two main issues: hallucinations (where LLMs produce inaccurate or irrelevant responses) and the sensitivity of responses to the order of the presented options. To address these issues, we propose combining text mining with questionnaires method. Text mining can extract psychological features from the LLMs' responses without being affected by the order of options. Furthermore, because this method does not rely on specific answers, it reduces the influence of hallucinations. By normalizing the scores from both methods and calculating the root mean square error, our experiment results confirm the effectiveness of this approach. To further investigate the origins of personality traits in LLMs, we conduct experiments on both pre-trained language models (PLMs), such as BERT and GPT, as well as conversational models (ChatLLMs), such as ChatGPT. The results show that LLMs do contain certain personalities, for example, ChatGPT and ChatGLM exhibit the personality traits of 'Conscientiousness'. Additionally, we find that the personalities of LLMs are derived from their pre-trained data. The instruction data used to train ChatLLMs can enhance the generation of data containing personalities and expose their hidden personality. We compare the results with the human average personality score, and we find that the personality of FLAN-T5 in PLMs and ChatGPT in ChatLLMs is more similar to that of a human, with score differences of 0.34 and 0.22, respectively.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2024.
Builds on
17 of 52 references.
References · 17
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
- 2021GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infillingcited by 1,026
- 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traitscited by 229
- 2022Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographicscited by 112
- 2023Boosting Theory-of-Mind Performance in Large Language Models via Promptingcited by 64
- 2023ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: Artificial Intelligence-Written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishingcited by 51
5 more
- 2022Estimating the Personality of White-Box Language Modelscited by 47
- 2023Have Large Language Models Developed a Personality?: Applicability of Self-Assessment Tests in Measuring Personality in LLMscited by 32
- 2023Systematic Evaluation of GPT-3 for Zero-Shot Personality Estimationcited by 28
- 2022Measuring the Impact of (Psycho-)Linguistic and Readability Features and Their Spill Over Effects on the Prediction of Eye Movement Patternscited by 8
- 2023PsyAttention: Psychological Attention Model for Personality Detectioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.