Robustness Auditing for Linear Regression: To Singularity and Beyond
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It has recently been discovered that the conclusions of many highly influential econometrics studies can be overturned by removing a very small fraction of their samples (often less than 0.5%). These conclusions are typically based on the results of one or more Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regressions, raising the question: given a dataset, can we certify the robustness of an OLS fit on this dataset to the removal of a given number of samples? Brute-force techniques quickly break down even on small datasets. Existing approaches which go beyond brute force either can only find candidate small subsets to remove (but cannot certify their non-existence) [BGM20, KZC21], are computationally intractable beyond low dimensional settings [MR22], or require very strong assumptions on the data distribution and too many samples to give reasonable bounds in practice [BP21, FH23]. We present an efficient algorithm for certifying the robustness of linear regressions to removals of samples. We implement our algorithm and run it on several landmark econometrics datasets with hundreds of dimensions and tens of thousands of samples, giving the first non-trivial certificates of robustness to sample removal for datasets of dimension 4 or greater. We prove that under distributional assumptions on a dataset, the bounds produced by our algorithm are tight up to a 1 + o(1) multiplicative factor.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.
Builds on
8 of 27 references.
References · 8
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 189
- 2019Recent Advances in Algorithmic High-Dimensional Robust Statisticscited by 101
- 2017Resilience: A Criterion for Learning in the Presence of Arbitrary Outlierscited by 43
- 2020An Automatic Finite-Sample Robustness Metric: When Can Dropping a Little Data Make a Big Difference?cited by 27
- 2019How Hard Is Robust Mean Estimation?cited by 16
- 2022Provably Auditing Ordinary Least Squares in Low Dimensionscited by 6
- 2023Towards Practical Robustness Auditing for Linear Regressioncited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025What Data Enables Optimal Decisions? An Exact Characterization for Linear Optimizationcited by 9
- 2025Dropping Just a Handful of Preferences Can Change Top Large Language Model Rankingscited by 8
- 2025Rescaled Influence Functions: Accurate Data Attribution in High Dimensioncited by 4
- 2025Testing Most Influential Setscited by 2
- 2025On the Accuracy of Newton Step and Influence Function Data Attributionscited by 1
- 2026Finding Most Influential Setscited by 0
- 2026Finding Most Influential Sets4 Jun 2026
- 2025On the Accuracy of Newton Step and Influence Function Data Attributions14 Dec 2025
- 2025Testing Most Influential Sets23 Oct 2025
- 2025Dropping Just a Handful of Preferences Can Change Top Large Language Model Rankings16 Aug 2025
- 2025Rescaled Influence Functions: Accurate Data Attribution in High Dimension7 Jun 2025
- 2025What Data Enables Optimal Decisions? An Exact Characterization for Linear Optimization27 May 2025