mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Quantifying The Privacy Of Redacted Text

arXiv 2410.07772 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we propose use of a k-anonymity-like approach for evaluating the privacy of redacted text. Given a piece of redacted text we use a state of the art transformer-based deep learning network to reconstruct the original text. This generates multiple full texts that are consistent with the redacted text, i.e. which are grammatical, have the same non-redacted words etc, and represents each of these using an embedding vector that captures sentence similarity. In this way we can estimate the number, diversity and quality of full text consistent with the redacted text and so evaluate privacy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.

Builds on

5 of 13 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  2. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  3. 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 107
  4. 2020MeDAL: Medical Abbreviation Disambiguation Dataset for Natural Language Understanding Pretrainingcited by 18
  5. 2020Privacy Guarantees for De-identifying Text Transformationscited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.