A short note about the learning-augmented secretary problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the secretary problem through the lens of learning-augmented algorithms. As it is known that the best possible expected competitive ratio is 1/e in the classic setting without predictions, a natural goal is to design algorithms that are 1-consistent and 1/e-robust. Unfortunately, [FY24] provided hardness constructions showing that such a goal is not attainable when the candidates' true values are allowed to scale with n. Here, we provide a simple and explicit alternative hardness construction showing that such a goal is not achievable even when the candidates' true values are constants that do not scale with n.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Fair Secretaries with Unfair Predictionscited by 4
- 2026The Secretary Problem with Predictions and a Chosen Ordercited by 2
- 2026The Secretary Problem with Predictions and a Chosen Order12 Jan 2026
- 2024Fair Secretaries with Unfair Predictions15 Nov 2024