Improving Predictor Reliability with Selective Recalibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A reliable deep learning system should be able to accurately express its confidence with respect to its predictions, a quality known as calibration. One of the most effective ways to produce reliable confidence estimates with a pre-trained model is by applying a post-hoc recalibration method. Popular recalibration methods like temperature scaling are typically fit on a small amount of data and work in the model's output space, as opposed to the more expressive feature embedding space, and thus usually have only one or a handful of parameters. However, the target distribution to which they are applied is often complex and difficult to fit well with such a function. To this end we propose textitselective recalibration, where a selection model learns to reject some user-chosen proportion of the data in order to allow the recalibrator to focus on regions of the input space that can be well-captured by such a model. We provide theoretical analysis to motivate our algorithm, and test our method through comprehensive experiments on difficult medical imaging and zero-shot classification tasks. Our results show that selective recalibration consistently leads to significantly lower calibration error than a wide range of selection and recalibration baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.
Builds on
23 of 39 references.
References · 23
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
- 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 333
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
- 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 298
- 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 228
11 more
- 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
- 2020Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimationcited by 100
- 2021Soft Calibration Objectives for Neural Networkscited by 89
- 2021When and How Mixup Improves Calibrationcited by 59
- 2020Selective Classification Can Magnify Disparities Across Groupscited by 35
- 2021Selective Regression Under Fairness Criteriacited by 34
- 2022Beyond calibration: estimating the grouping loss of modern neural networkscited by 32
- 2022Calibrated Selective Classificationcited by 30
- 2023Prompt Risk Control: A Rigorous Framework for Responsible Deployment of Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2022Quantile Risk Control: A Flexible Framework for Bounding the Probability of High-Loss Predictionscited by 14
- 2023Distribution-Free Statistical Dispersion Control for Societal Applicationscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.