mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Predictor Reliability with Selective Recalibration

arXiv 2410.05407 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A reliable deep learning system should be able to accurately express its confidence with respect to its predictions, a quality known as calibration. One of the most effective ways to produce reliable confidence estimates with a pre-trained model is by applying a post-hoc recalibration method. Popular recalibration methods like temperature scaling are typically fit on a small amount of data and work in the model's output space, as opposed to the more expressive feature embedding space, and thus usually have only one or a handful of parameters. However, the target distribution to which they are applied is often complex and difficult to fit well with such a function. To this end we propose textitselective recalibration, where a selection model learns to reject some user-chosen proportion of the data in order to allow the recalibrator to focus on regions of the input space that can be well-captured by such a model. We provide theoretical analysis to motivate our algorithm, and test our method through comprehensive experiments on difficult medical imaging and zero-shot classification tasks. Our results show that selective recalibration consistently leads to significantly lower calibration error than a wide range of selection and recalibration baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.

Builds on

23 of 39 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  3. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  4. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  5. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  6. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
  7. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
  8. 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 333
  9. 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
  10. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
  11. 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 298
  12. 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 228
11 more
  1. 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
  2. 2020Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimationcited by 100
  3. 2021Soft Calibration Objectives for Neural Networkscited by 89
  4. 2021When and How Mixup Improves Calibrationcited by 59
  5. 2020Selective Classification Can Magnify Disparities Across Groupscited by 35
  6. 2021Selective Regression Under Fairness Criteriacited by 34
  7. 2022Beyond calibration: estimating the grouping loss of modern neural networkscited by 32
  8. 2022Calibrated Selective Classificationcited by 30
  9. 2023Prompt Risk Control: A Rigorous Framework for Responsible Deployment of Large Language Modelscited by 17
  10. 2022Quantile Risk Control: A Flexible Framework for Bounding the Probability of High-Loss Predictionscited by 14
  11. 2023Distribution-Free Statistical Dispersion Control for Societal Applicationscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.