Taylor Unswift: Secured Weight Release for Large Language Models via Taylor Expansion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring the security of released large language models (LLMs) poses a significant dilemma, as existing mechanisms either compromise ownership rights or raise data privacy concerns. To address this dilemma, we introduce TaylorMLP to protect the ownership of released LLMs and prevent their abuse. Specifically, TaylorMLP preserves the ownership of LLMs by transforming the weights of LLMs into parameters of Taylor-series. Instead of releasing the original weights, developers can release the Taylor-series parameters with users, thereby ensuring the security of LLMs. Moreover, TaylorMLP can prevent abuse of LLMs by adjusting the generation speed. It can induce low-speed token generation for the protected LLMs by increasing the terms in the Taylor-series. This intentional delay helps LLM developers prevent potential large-scale unauthorized uses of their models. Empirical experiments across five datasets and three LLM architectures demonstrate that TaylorMLP induces over 4x increase in latency, producing the tokens precisely matched with original LLMs. Subsequent defensive experiments further confirm that TaylorMLP effectively prevents users from reconstructing the weight values based on downstream datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2024.
Builds on
23 of 36 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
11 more
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 653
- 2024KIVI: A Tuning-Free Asymmetric 2bit Quantization for KV Cachecited by 604
- 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 559
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 409
- 2020The Cost of Training NLP Models: A Concise Overviewcited by 97
- 2023Offsite-Tuning: Transfer Learning without Full Modelcited by 77
- 2022MPCFormer: fast, performant and private Transformer inference with MPCcited by 67
- 2024Assessing and Enhancing Large Language Models in Rare Disease Question-answeringcited by 16
- 2024TransLinkGuard: Safeguarding Transformer Models Against Model Stealing in Edge Deploymentcited by 11
- 2021Protecting Your NLG Models with Semantic and Robust Watermarkscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.