The Role of Governments in Increasing Interconnected Post-Deployment Monitoring of AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language-based AI systems are diffusing into society, bringing positive and negative impacts. Mitigating negative impacts depends on accurate impact assessments, drawn from an empirical evidence base that makes causal connections between AI usage and impacts. Interconnected post-deployment monitoring combines information about model integration and use, application use, and incidents and impacts. For example, inference time monitoring of chain-of-thought reasoning can be combined with long-term monitoring of sectoral AI diffusion, impacts and incidents. Drawing on information sharing mechanisms in other industries, we highlight example data sources and specific data points that governments could collect to inform AI risk management.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.
Builds on
22 of 72 references.
References · 22
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
- 2023GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Modelscited by 176
- 2023Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systemscited by 135
- 2020Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Databasecited by 96
- 2024Teams of LLM Agents can Exploit Zero-Day Vulnerabilitiescited by 95
- 2024Visibility into AI Agentscited by 79
- 2022Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governancecited by 67
- 2023Testing Language Model Agents Safely in the Wildcited by 46
- 2023AI capabilities can be significantly improved without expensive retrainingcited by 28
- 2024AI Companions Reduce Lonelinesscited by 28
- 2023Risk assessment at AGI companies: A review of popular risk assessment techniques from other safety-critical industriescited by 19
10 more
- 2024The 2024 Foundation Model Transparency Indexcited by 19
- 2024Auditing Work: Exploring the New York City algorithmic bias audit regimecited by 18
- 2022AI Ethics Issues in Real World: Evidence from AI Incident Databasecited by 14
- 2023Deployment Corrections: An incident response framework for frontier AI modelscited by 9
- 2023The AI Incident Database as an Educational Tool to Raise Awareness of AI Harms: A Classroom Exploration of Efficacy, Limitations, & Future Improvementscited by 8
- 2023Exploring the Relevance of Data Privacy-Enhancing Technologies for AI Governance Use Casescited by 6
- 2024Merging AI Incidents Research with Political Misinformation Research: Introducing the Political Deepfakes Incidents Databasecited by 4
- 2024Who Should Run Advanced AI Evaluations -- AISIs?cited by 3
- 2024The Atlas of AI Incidents in Mobile Computing: Visualizing the Risks and Benefits of AI Gone Mobilecited by 2
- 2023Putting collective intelligence to the enforcement of the Digital Services Actcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Clio: Privacy-Preserving Insights into Real-World AI Usecited by 72
- 2026How are AI agents used? Evidence from 177,000 MCP toolscited by 7
- 2025International Agreements on AI Safety: Review and Recommendations for a Conditional AI Safety Treatycited by 4
- 2025NeurIPS should lead scientific consensus on AI policycited by 3
- 2025Cross-Asset Risk Management: Integrating LLMs for Real-Time Monitoring of Equity, Fixed Income, and Currency Marketscited by 2
- 2026Open Problems in AI Incident Governancecited by 1
- 2026Physiological Noise Augmentation Improves Non-Invasive Brain-to-Speechcited by 0
- 2026Physiological Noise Augmentation Improves Non-Invasive Brain-to-Speech6 Jul 2026
- 2026Open Problems in AI Incident Governance6 Jul 2026
- 2026How are AI agents used? Evidence from 177,000 MCP tools25 Mar 2026
- 2025NeurIPS should lead scientific consensus on AI policy30 Sep 2025
- 2025Cross-Asset Risk Management: Integrating LLMs for Real-Time Monitoring of Equity, Fixed Income, and Currency Markets5 Apr 2025
- 2025International Agreements on AI Safety: Review and Recommendations for a Conditional AI Safety Treaty18 Mar 2025
- 2024Clio: Privacy-Preserving Insights into Real-World AI Use18 Dec 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Documenting Deployment with Fabric: A Repository of Real-World AI Governance
- 2026Exploring Systems-Thinking Approaches to Loss of Control Risk
- 2026Jobs' AI Exposure Should Be Measured from Evidence, Not Model Priors
- 2025Who Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations
- 2026Questionnaire Responses Do not Capture the Safety of AI Agents
- 2025Probing and Steering Evaluation Awareness of Language Models
- 2025Verifying International Agreements on AI: Six Layers of Verification for Rules on Large-Scale AI Development and Deployment
- 2025From Accuracy to Impact: The Impact-Driven AI Framework (IDAIF) for Aligning Engineering Architecture with Theory of Change