Dynamic Evidence Decoupling for Trusted Multi-view Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-view learning methods often focus on improving decision accuracy, while neglecting the decision uncertainty, limiting their suitability for safety-critical applications. To mitigate this, researchers propose trusted multi-view learning methods that estimate classification probabilities and uncertainty by learning the class distributions for each instance. However, these methods assume that the data from each view can effectively differentiate all categories, ignoring the semantic vagueness phenomenon in real-world multi-view data. Our findings demonstrate that this phenomenon significantly suppresses the learning of view-specific evidence in existing methods. We propose a Consistent and Complementary-aware trusted Multi-view Learning (CCML) method to solve this problem. We first construct view opinions using evidential deep neural networks, which consist of belief mass vectors and uncertainty estimates. Next, we dynamically decouple the consistent and complementary evidence. The consistent evidence is derived from the shared portions across all views, while the complementary evidence is obtained by averaging the differing portions across all views. We ensure that the opinion constructed from the consistent evidence strictly aligns with the ground-truth category. For the opinion constructed from the complementary evidence, we allow it for potential vagueness in the evidence. We compare CCML with state-of-the-art baselines on one synthetic and six real-world datasets. The results validate the effectiveness of the dynamic evidence decoupling strategy and show that CCML significantly outperforms baselines on accuracy and reliability. The code is released at https://github.com/Lihong-Liu/CCML.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.
Builds on
13 of 44 references.
References · 13
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
- 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 463
- 2022Trusted Multi-View Classification with Dynamic Evidential Fusioncited by 168
- 2016On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning: Objectives and Optimizationcited by 162
- 2023Uncertainty Estimation by Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep Learningcited by 58
- 2021Multi-VAE: Learning Disentangled View-common and View-peculiar Visual Representations for Multi-view Clusteringcited by 51
- 2024Multimodal Fusion on Low-quality Data: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 49
- 2024Reliable Conflictive Multi-View Learningcited by 45
- 2014Majority Vote of Diverse Classifiers for Late Fusioncited by 23
- 2022Disentangled Multimodal Representation Learning for Recommendationcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2024Generalized Trusted Multi-view Classification Framework with Hierarchical Opinion Aggregationcited by 1
- 2026CFCML: A Coarse-to-Fine Crossmodal Learning Framework For Disease Diagnosis Using Multimodal Images and Tabular Datacited by 1
- 2026Multimodal Learning on Low-Quality Data with Conformal Predictive Self-Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026Robust Fuzzy Multi-view Learning under View Conflictcited by 0
- 2026Robust Fuzzy Multi-view Learning under View Conflict23 May 2026
- 2026Multimodal Learning on Low-Quality Data with Conformal Predictive Self-Calibration5 May 2026
- 2026CFCML: A Coarse-to-Fine Crossmodal Learning Framework For Disease Diagnosis Using Multimodal Images and Tabular Data20 Mar 2026
- 2024Generalized Trusted Multi-view Classification Framework with Hierarchical Opinion Aggregation6 Nov 2024