CliMB: An AI-enabled Partner for Clinical Predictive Modeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite its significant promise and continuous technical advances, real-world applications of artificial intelligence (AI) remain limited. We attribute this to the "domain expert-AI-conundrum": while domain experts, such as clinician scientists, should be able to build predictive models such as risk scores, they face substantial barriers in accessing state-of-the-art (SOTA) tools. While automated machine learning (AutoML) has been proposed as a partner in clinical predictive modeling, many additional requirements need to be fulfilled to make machine learning accessible for clinician scientists. To address this gap, we introduce CliMB, a no-code AI-enabled partner designed to empower clinician scientists to create predictive models using natural language. CliMB guides clinician scientists through the entire medical data science pipeline, thus empowering them to create predictive models from real-world data in just one conversation. CliMB also creates structured reports and interpretable visuals. In evaluations involving clinician scientists and systematic comparisons against a baseline GPT-4, CliMB consistently demonstrated superior performance in key areas such as planning, error prevention, code execution, and model performance. Moreover, in blinded assessments involving 45 clinicians from diverse specialties and career stages, more than 80% preferred CliMB over GPT-4. Overall, by providing a no-code interface with clear guidance and access to SOTA methods in the fields of data-centric AI, AutoML, and interpretable ML, CliMB empowers clinician scientists to build robust predictive models. The proof-of-concept version of CliMB is available as open-source software on GitHub: https://github.com/vanderschaarlab/climb.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2024.
Builds on
16 of 68 references.
References · 16
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 383
- 2018GAIN: Missing Data Imputation using Generative Adversarial Netscited by 352
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
- 2021SMAC3: A Versatile Bayesian Optimization Package for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 230
- 2022HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model Selectioncited by 83
- 2023AutoML-GPT: Automatic Machine Learning with GPTcited by 81
- 2021Explaining Hyperparameter Optimization via Partial Dependence Plotscited by 35
- 2023AutoML in the Age of Large Language Models: Current Challenges, Future Opportunities and Riskscited by 35
- 2022Data-IQ: Characterizing subgroups with heterogeneous outcomes in tabular datacited by 22
4 more
- 2024Position: A Call to Action for a Human-Centered AutoML Paradigmcited by 14
- 2019Towards Automatic Concept-based Explanationscited by 11
- 2019Towards Human Centered AutoMLcited by 5
- 2015Episodic Multi-armed Banditscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.