Comparative Analysis and Ensemble Enhancement of Leading CNN Architectures for Breast Cancer Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study introduces a novel and accurate approach to breast cancer classification using histopathology images. It systematically compares leading Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models across varying image datasets, identifies their optimal hyperparameters, and ranks them based on classification efficacy. To maximize classification accuracy for each model we explore, the effects of data augmentation, alternative fully-connected layers, model training hyperparameter settings, and, the advantages of retraining models versus using pre-trained weights. Our methodology includes several original concepts, including serializing generated datasets to ensure consistent data conditions across training runs and significantly reducing training duration. Combined with automated curation of results, this enabled the exploration of over 2,000 training permutations -- such a comprehensive comparison is as yet unprecedented. Our findings establish the settings required to achieve exceptional classification accuracy for standalone CNN models and rank them by model efficacy. Based on these results, we propose ensemble architectures that stack three high-performing standalone CNN models together with diverse classifiers, resulting in improved classification accuracy. The ability to systematically run so many model permutations to get the best outcomes gives rise to very high quality results, including 99.75% for BreakHis x40 and BreakHis x200 and 95.18% for the Bach datasets when split into train, validation and test datasets. The Bach Online blind challenge, yielded 89% using this approach. Whilst this study is based on breast cancer histopathology image datasets, the methodology is equally applicable to other medical image datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.
Builds on
13 of 41 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
- 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,097
- 2018BACH: Grand Challenge on Breast Cancer Histology Imagescited by 131
- 2018Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Breast Cancer Histology Image Analysiscited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.