mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Watermarked LLMs be Identified by Users via Crafted Prompts?

arXiv 2410.03168 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2024cs.CR cs.CLcited by 10

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Text watermarking for Large Language Models (LLMs) has made significant progress in detecting LLM outputs and preventing misuse. Current watermarking techniques offer high detectability, minimal impact on text quality, and robustness to text editing. However, current researches lack investigation into the imperceptibility of watermarking techniques in LLM services. This is crucial as LLM providers may not want to disclose the presence of watermarks in real-world scenarios, as it could reduce user willingness to use the service and make watermarks more vulnerable to attacks. This work is the first to investigate the imperceptibility of watermarked LLMs. We design an identification algorithm called Water-Probe that detects watermarks through well-designed prompts to the LLM. Our key motivation is that current watermarked LLMs expose consistent biases under the same watermark key, resulting in similar differences across prompts under different watermark keys. Experiments show that almost all mainstream watermarking algorithms are easily identified with our well-designed prompts, while Water-Probe demonstrates a minimal false positive rate for non-watermarked LLMs. Finally, we propose that the key to enhancing the imperceptibility of watermarked LLMs is to increase the randomness of watermark key selection. Based on this, we introduce the Water-Bag strategy, which significantly improves watermark imperceptibility by merging multiple watermark keys.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 32 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.

Builds on

32 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 21

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Distortion-free Watermarks are not Truly Distortion-free under Watermark Key Collisions2 Jun
  2. 2024Large Language Model Watermark Stealing With Mixed Integer Programming30 May
  3. 2024Black-Box Detection of Language Model Watermarks28 May
  4. 2024MarkLLM: An Open-Source Toolkit for LLM Watermarking16 May
  5. 2024An Entropy-based Text Watermarking Detection Method20 Mar
  6. 2024Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutions19 Mar
  7. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models29 Feb
  8. 2024Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactive22 Feb
  9. 2024Can Watermarks Survive Translation? On the Cross-lingual Consistency of Text Watermark for Large Language Models21 Feb
  10. 2023A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Models13 Dec
  11. 2023REMARK-LLM: A Robust and Efficient Watermarking Framework for Generative Large Language Models18 Oct
  12. 2023Embarrassingly Simple Text Watermarks13 Oct
9 more
  1. 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Models10 Oct
  2. 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models22 Sep
  3. 2023An Unforgeable Publicly Verifiable Watermark for Large Language Models30 Jul
  4. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  5. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  6. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models7 Jun
  7. 2023Watermarking Text Generated by Black-Box Language Models14 May
  8. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?17 Mar
  9. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan

Other references · 11

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  5. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  6. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
  7. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  8. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
  9. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
  10. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 380
  11. 2023ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Toolscited by 273

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

10 papers.