FedCert: Federated Accuracy Certification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for training machine learning models in a decentralized manner, preserving data privacy by keeping local data on clients. However, evaluating the robustness of these models against data perturbations on clients remains a significant challenge. Previous studies have assessed the effectiveness of models in centralized training based on certified accuracy, which guarantees that a certain percentage of the model's predictions will remain correct even if the input data is perturbed. However, the challenge of extending these evaluations to FL remains unresolved due to the unknown client's local data. To tackle this challenge, this study proposed a method named FedCert to take the first step toward evaluating the robustness of FL systems. The proposed method is designed to approximate the certified accuracy of a global model based on the certified accuracy and class distribution of each client. Additionally, considering the Non-Independent and Identically Distributed (Non-IID) nature of data in real-world scenarios, we introduce the client grouping algorithm to ensure reliable certified accuracy during the aggregation step of the approximation algorithm. Through theoretical analysis, we demonstrate the effectiveness of FedCert in assessing the robustness and reliability of FL systems. Moreover, experimental results on the CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets under various scenarios show that FedCert consistently reduces the estimation error compared to baseline methods. This study offers a solution for evaluating the robustness of FL systems and lays the groundwork for future research to enhance the dependability of decentralized learning. The source code is available at https://github.com/thanhhff/FedCert/.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.
Builds on
16 of 20 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 633
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
- 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
- 2021Federated Learning for Open Bankingcited by 138
- 2020Robust Federated Learning: The Case of Affine Distribution Shiftscited by 102
4 more
- 2022NVIDIA FLARE: Federated Learning from Simulation to Real-Worldcited by 78
- 2022Federated Adversarial Learning: A Framework with Convergence Analysiscited by 17
- 2021Certifiably-Robust Federated Adversarial Learning via Randomized Smoothingcited by 9
- 2022Certified Robustness in Federated Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.