The Impact of Generative AI on Collaborative Open-Source Software Development: Evidence from GitHub Copilot
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) facilitates content production and enhances ideation, with potentially important implications for developer productivity and participation in software development. To explore its impact on collaborative open-source software (OSS) development, we investigate the role of GitHub Copilot, a generative AI pair programmer, in OSS development where multiple distributed developers voluntarily collaborate. Using GitHub's proprietary Copilot usage data, combined with public OSS project data obtained from GitHub, we find that Copilot use increases project-level code contributions by 5.9%. This gain is accompanied by a 3.4% increase in developer coding participation and a 2.1% increase in individual code contributions. However, Copilot use is also associated with an 8% increase in coordination time and more code discussions. This reveals an important tradeoff: While AI expands who can contribute and how much they contribute, it slows coordination in collective development efforts. Despite this tension, the overall effect remains positive, resulting in a net increase in the timely merge of code contributions at the project level. Interestingly, we also find heterogeneous effects across developer roles. Peripheral developers exhibit relatively smaller increases in project-level code contributions and larger increases in coordination time than core developers. Together, our findings highlight the dual effects of AI pair programmers on code contributions and coordination in OSS development and provide implications for how generative AI may reshape the structure of OSS communities over time.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.
Builds on
8 of 71 references.
References · 8
- 2023The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilotcited by 264
- 2022Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating Modelscited by 216
- 2022GitHub Copilot AI pair programmer: Asset or Liability?cited by 150
- 2024The Impact of Large Language Models on Open-source Innovation: Evidence from GitHub Copilotcited by 13
- 2016Predicting the Popularity of GitHub Repositoriescited by 6
- 2021A Practical Guide to Counterfactual Estimators for Causal Inference with Time-Series Cross-Sectional Datacited by 4
- 2014Open Collaboration for Innovation: Principles and Performancecited by 1
- 2021Using Multiple Pre-treatment Periods to Improve Difference-in-Differences and Staggered Adoption Designcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 7.
11 papers.
- 2025Speed at the Cost of Quality: How Cursor AI Increases Short-Term Velocity and Long-Term Complexity in Open-Source Projectscited by 23
- 2025AI Code in the Wild: Measuring Security Risks and Ecosystem Shifts of AI-Generated Code in Modern Softwarecited by 4
- 2025Pre-Filtering Code Suggestions using Developer Behavioral Telemetry to Optimize LLM-Assisted Programmingcited by 2
- 2026Orchestrating Human-AI Software Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Field Study of Three Software Modernization Programscited by 2
- 2026Artificial Intelligence in Open Source Software Engineering: A Foundation for Sustainabilitycited by 1
- 2026Bridging Generation and Training: A Systematic Review of Quality Issues in LLMs for Codecited by 1
- 2026Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Reviewcited by 1
- 2026Adoption and Impact of Command-Line AI Coding Agents: A Study of Microsoft's Early 2026 Rollout of Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLIcited by 1
- 2025RescueLens: LLM-Powered Triage and Action on Volunteer Feedback for Food Rescuecited by 0
- 2026From Conversation to Contribution: Characterizing Coding Agent in Open-Source Softwarecited by 0
- 2026Do These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends? Measuring the Post-Merge Fate of Agentic Codecited by 0
- 2026Do These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends? Measuring the Post-Merge Fate of Agentic Code10 Jul 2026
- 2026From Conversation to Contribution: Characterizing Coding Agent in Open-Source Software6 Jul 2026
- 2026Adoption and Impact of Command-Line AI Coding Agents: A Study of Microsoft's Early 2026 Rollout of Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI1 Jul 2026
- 2026Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Review17 May 2026
- 2026Bridging Generation and Training: A Systematic Review of Quality Issues in LLMs for Code6 May 2026
- 2026Orchestrating Human-AI Software Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Field Study of Three Software Modernization Programs20 Mar 2026
- 2026Artificial Intelligence in Open Source Software Engineering: A Foundation for Sustainability5 Feb 2026
- 2025AI Code in the Wild: Measuring Security Risks and Ecosystem Shifts of AI-Generated Code in Modern Software21 Dec 2025
- 2025Pre-Filtering Code Suggestions using Developer Behavioral Telemetry to Optimize LLM-Assisted Programming24 Nov 2025
- 2025RescueLens: LLM-Powered Triage and Action on Volunteer Feedback for Food Rescue19 Nov 2025
- 2025Speed at the Cost of Quality: How Cursor AI Increases Short-Term Velocity and Long-Term Complexity in Open-Source Projects6 Nov 2025