Auction-Based Regulation for Artificial Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In an era of "moving fast and breaking things", regulators have moved slowly to pick up the safety, bias, and legal debris left in the wake of broken Artificial Intelligence (AI) deployment. While there is much-warranted discussion about how to address the safety, bias, and legal woes of state-of-the-art AI models, rigorous and realistic mathematical frameworks to regulate AI are lacking. Our paper addresses this challenge, proposing an auction-based regulatory mechanism that provably incentivizes agents (i) to deploy compliant models and (ii) to participate in the regulation process. We formulate AI regulation as an all-pay auction where enterprises submit models for approval. The regulator enforces compliance thresholds and further rewards models exhibiting higher compliance than their peers. We derive Nash Equilibria demonstrating that rational agents will submit models exceeding the prescribed compliance threshold. Empirical results show that our regulatory auction boosts compliance rates by 20% and participation rates by 15% compared to baseline regulatory mechanisms, outperforming simpler frameworks that merely impose minimum compliance standards.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.
Builds on
15 of 61 references.
References · 15
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
- 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 259
- 2024Reinforcement learningcited by 236
- 2024Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearningcited by 134
- 2024PyRIT: A Framework for Security Risk Identification and Red Teaming in Generative AI Systemcited by 29
- 2024Exploring the Deceptive Power of LLM-Generated Fake News: A Study of Real-World Detection Challengescited by 28
Built on by
Not cited yet.