Replacement Learning: Training Vision Tasks with Fewer Learnable Parameters
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional end-to-end deep learning models often enhance feature representation and overall performance by increasing the depth and complexity of the network during training. However, this approach inevitably introduces issues of parameter redundancy and resource inefficiency, especially in deeper networks. While existing works attempt to skip certain redundant layers to alleviate these problems, challenges related to poor performance, computational complexity, and inefficient memory usage remain. To address these issues, we propose an innovative training approach called Replacement Learning, which mitigates these limitations by completely replacing all the parameters of the frozen layers with only two learnable parameters. Specifically, Replacement Learning selectively freezes the parameters of certain layers, and the frozen layers utilize parameters from adjacent layers, updating them through a parameter integration mechanism controlled by two learnable parameters. This method leverages information from surrounding structures, reduces computation, conserves GPU memory, and maintains a balance between historical context and new inputs, ultimately enhancing overall model performance. We conducted experiments across four benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-10, STL-10, SVHN, and ImageNet, utilizing various architectures such as CNNs and ViTs to validate the effectiveness of Replacement Learning. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach reduces the number of parameters, training time, and memory consumption while completely surpassing the performance of end-to-end training.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.
Builds on
24 of 40 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2016Direct Feedback Alignment Provides Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 240
- 2014Difference Target Propagationcited by 144
- 2016Decoupled Neural Interfaces using Synthetic Gradientscited by 135
- 2018Assessing the Scalability of Biologically-Motivated Deep Learning Algorithms and Architecturescited by 100
- 2019What Can ResNet Learn Efficiently, Going Beyond Kernels?cited by 91
- 2015A Primer on Neural Network Models for Natural Language Processingcited by 75
12 more
- 2021Focus on Local: Detecting Lane Marker from Bottom Up via Key Pointcited by 65
- 2022Scaling Forward Gradient With Local Lossescited by 65
- 2022Error-driven Input Modulation: Solving the Credit Assignment Problem without a Backward Passcited by 63
- 2014Random feedback weights support learning in deep neural networkscited by 47
- 2017Deep supervised learning using local errorscited by 41
- 2023Skip-Attention: Improving Vision Transformers by Paying Less Attentioncited by 23
- 2017The exploding gradient problem demystified - definition, prevalence, impact, origin, tradeoffs, and solutionscited by 14
- 2022To update or not to update? Neurons at equilibrium in deep modelscited by 13
- 2024Momentum Auxiliary Network for Supervised Local Learningcited by 9
- 2024Advancing Supervised Local Learning Beyond Classification with Long-term Feature Bankcited by 6
- 2024MLAAN: Scaling Supervised Local Learning with Multilaminar Leap Augmented Auxiliary Networkcited by 5
- 2024HPFF: Hierarchical Locally Supervised Learning with Patch Feature Fusioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.