mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Expected Diverse Utility (EDU): Diverse Bayesian Optimization of Expensive Computer Simulators

arXiv 2410.01196 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2024stat.AP cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The optimization of expensive black-box simulators arises in a myriad of modern scientific and engineering applications. Bayesian optimization provides an appealing solution, by leveraging a fitted surrogate model to guide the selection of subsequent simulator evaluations. In practice, however, the objective is often not to obtain a single good solution, but rather a ``basket'' of good solutions from which users can choose for downstream decision-making. This need arises in our motivating application for real-time control of internal combustion engines for flight propulsion, where a diverse set of control strategies is essential for stable flight control. There has been little work on this front for Bayesian optimization. We thus propose a new Expected Diverse Utility (EDU) method that searches for diverse ``ε-optimal'' solutions: locally-optimal solutions within a tolerance level ε > 0 from a global optimum. We show that EDU yields a closed-form acquisition function under a Gaussian process surrogate model, which facilitates efficient sequential queries via automatic differentiation. This closed form further reveals a novel exploration-exploitation-diversity trade-off, which incorporates the desired diversity property within the well-known exploration-exploitation trade-off. We demonstrate the improvement of EDU over existing methods in a suite of numerical experiments, then explore the EDU in two applications on rover trajectory optimization and engine control for flight propulsion.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.

Builds on

17 of 71 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  3. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 765
  4. 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
  5. 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 144
  6. 2017Batched Large-scale Bayesian Optimization in High-dimensional Spacescited by 116
  7. 2016The Parallel Knowledge Gradient Method for Batch Bayesian Optimizationcited by 73
  8. 2018Adversarially Robust Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 61
  9. 2022Discovering Many Diverse Solutions with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 29
  10. 2015Bayesian Optimization for Synthetic Gene Designcited by 21
  11. 2019A hierarchical expected improvement method for Bayesian optimizationcited by 13
  12. 2021Triangulation candidates for Bayesian optimizationcited by 11
5 more
  1. 2019Function-on-function kriging, with applications to 3D printing of aortic tissuescited by 9
  2. 2023Contour Location for Reliability in Airfoil Simulation Experiments using Deep Gaussian Processescited by 7
  3. 2023Additive Multi-Index Gaussian process modeling, with application to multi-physics surrogate modeling of the quark-gluon plasmacited by 6
  4. 2023Robust expected improvement for Bayesian optimizationcited by 5
  5. 2024Targeted Variance Reduction: Robust Bayesian Optimization of Black-Box Simulators with Noise Parameterscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.