mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Contrastive Token Learning with Similarity Decay for Repetition Suppression in Machine Translation

arXiv 2409.19877 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For crosslingual conversation and trade, Neural Machine Translation (NMT) is pivotal yet faces persistent challenges with monotony and repetition in generated content. Traditional solutions that rely on penalizing text redundancy or token reoccurrence have shown limited efficacy, particularly for lengthy article and e-commerce descriptions with inherent redundancy, even with the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs). This paper investigates the underlying causes of textual repetition through the lens of information entropy, attributing the phenomenon to the elevated uncertainty within the input text. To address this, a novel algorithm named Contrastive Token Learning with Similarity Decay (CTSD) is introduced, which modulates the suppression of tokens dynamically, informed by varying attention weights and inter-token distances. Furthermore, an e-commerce dataset comprised of title texts of online real items is compiled and released susceptible to hallucination translations to benchmark the algorithm. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that CTSD significantly outperforms existing approaches in precision and generalizability. Additional online A/B testing underscores its practical value, showing marked improvements in user engagement and conversion. Notably, this method has been implemented with full traffic on eight multilingual sites of alibaba.com, the largest B2B e-commerce platform in the world.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2024.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  7. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  8. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
  9. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
  10. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
  11. 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 559
  12. 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 467
12 more
  1. 2022A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text Generationcited by 224
  2. 2023Hallucinations in Large Multilingual Translation Modelscited by 126
  3. 2021Contrastive Learning for Many-to-many Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 108
  4. 2020A Theoretical Analysis of the Repetition Problem in Text Generationcited by 83
  5. 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
  6. 2022Contrastive Learning Reduces Hallucination in Conversationscited by 39
  7. 2022A Simple Contrastive Learning Objective for Alleviating Neural Text Degenerationcited by 18
  8. 2019Multilingual Multi-Domain Adaptation Approaches for Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
  9. 2020Training Multilingual Machine Translation by Alternately Freezing Language-Specific Encoders-Decoderscited by 8
  10. 2021Extremely low-resource machine translation for closely related languagescited by 7
  11. 2022Generating Coherent Narratives by Learning Dynamic and Discrete Entity States with a Contrastive Frameworkcited by 6
  12. 2024General2Specialized LLMs Translation for E-commercecited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.