SATA: Spatial Autocorrelation Token Analysis for Enhancing the Robustness of Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the past few years, vision transformers (ViTs) have consistently demonstrated remarkable performance across various visual recognition tasks. However, attempts to enhance their robustness have yielded limited success, mainly focusing on different training strategies, input patch augmentation, or network structural enhancements. These approaches often involve extensive training and fine-tuning, which are time-consuming and resource-intensive. To tackle these obstacles, we introduce a novel approach named Spatial Autocorrelation Token Analysis (SATA). By harnessing spatial relationships between token features, SATA enhances both the representational capacity and robustness of ViT models. This is achieved through the analysis and grouping of tokens according to their spatial autocorrelation scores prior to their input into the Feed-Forward Network (FFN) block of the self-attention mechanism. Importantly, SATA seamlessly integrates into existing pre-trained ViT baselines without requiring retraining or additional fine-tuning, while concurrently improving efficiency by reducing the computational load of the FFN units. Experimental results show that the baseline ViTs enhanced with SATA not only achieve a new state-of-the-art top-1 accuracy on ImageNet-1K image classification (94.9%) but also establish new state-of-the-art performance across multiple robustness benchmarks, including ImageNet-A (top-1=63.6%), ImageNet-R (top-1=79.2%), and ImageNet-C (mCE=13.6%), all without requiring additional training or fine-tuning of baseline models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2024.
Builds on
44 of 55 references.
References · 44
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,962
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,101
- 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 1,021
32 more
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 947
- 2021CrossViT: Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer for Image Classificationcited by 806
- 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 764
- 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 654
- 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 633
- 2021ConViT: Improving Vision Transformers with Soft Convolutional Inductive Biasescited by 484
- 2021LeViT: a Vision Transformer in ConvNet's Clothing for Faster Inferencecited by 475
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2022Not All Patches are What You Need: Expediting Vision Transformers via Token Reorganizationscited by 363
- 2021Rethinking Spatial Dimensions of Vision Transformerscited by 361
- 2021Focal Self-attention for Local-Global Interactions in Vision Transformerscited by 288
- 2021Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classificationcited by 249
- 2021Incorporating Convolution Designs into Visual Transformerscited by 248
- 2021AdaViT: Adaptive Vision Transformers for Efficient Image Recognitioncited by 228
- 2021ViTAE: Vision Transformer Advanced by Exploring Intrinsic Inductive Biascited by 216
- 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 207
- 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
- 2021Adaptive Token Sampling For Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 183
- 2021SPViT: Enabling Faster Vision Transformers via Soft Token Pruningcited by 167
- 2022Understanding The Robustness in Vision Transformerscited by 144
- 2021Towards Robust Vision Transformercited by 137
- 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Transformerscited by 106
- 2023TransNeXt: Robust Foveal Visual Perception for Vision Transformerscited by 61
- 2022Optimizing Relevance Maps of Vision Transformers Improves Robustnesscited by 41
- 2021Understanding and Improving Robustness of Vision Transformers through Patch-based Negative Augmentationcited by 40
- 2021Are Vision Transformers Robust to Patch Perturbations?cited by 39
- 2022CP-ViT: Cascade Vision Transformer Pruning via Progressive Sparsity Predictioncited by 39
- 2020Adversarially Robust Neural Architecturescited by 22
- 2023Robustifying Token Attention for Vision Transformerscited by 19
- 2016New Approaches for Calculating Moran's Index of Spatial Autocorrelationcited by 2
- 2024CSA-Net: Channel-wise Spatially Autocorrelated Attention Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.